Fenbendazole is a broad-spectrum de-wormer that is used to treat many of the intestinal parasites that affect pet animals.
According to much literature it is also a broad-spectrum cancer cure, so claims this article backed up with a long list of scientific papers.
Is it safe for humans? Seems to be as a variation of it, Mebendazole, is already widely used for intestinal parasites in humans and some cancer patients have already tried it with success.

Big Pharma, and industrialists as a whole, are the ones who are damaging science using their deep pockets to fund what research they deem fit for their own ends.

I would also point the finger at the Oil & Gas guys for the decommissioning of already launched satellites that will almost certainly add weight to the global warming issue.

Greed is killing science.

Here's an idea.
How about each $100k paid for a H-1B visa is used to educate an American bright enough to fill that job but too poor to put themselves through higher education.
I'm all for taxes to solve problems so long as the money raised is actually spent fixing the problem.
It's not that the country doesn't have the talent. It's just too much talent is going to waste.

Let me re-write that slightly.

Fuck off Elon.

What speeds did you see with your setup? response/prompt tokens/sec?
I found that the 70b R1 wasn't much different than the 32b or 14b in answers just slower in response.
It would be interesting to see comparisons between 120b and 20b gpts.

I've finally* got it running on my M4 Mac Mini (Pro C14/G20/N16, 64G Ram) and it's significantly better than R1 using the same questions.
Much more detailed answers and very nicely formatted output. That's for 20b and comparing it to deepseek-r1:70b.
Speed was ok, not blazing.
response tokens/sec was ~30, prompt tokens/sec ~175
I would guess it runs well too on an entry level M4 Mac Mini (C10/G10/N16) with its, now minimum, 16G ram.

* (Ollama got to 95% and then took 2 hours to get the last 5% downloaded. Everyone doing the same thing right now)

Why would you buy a M2 Ultra Mac Pro with 192GB Ram, 76Core GPU ($9599) rather than an M3 Ultra Mac Studio with 256GB of Ram and 80Core GPU ($7099)?
The Pro Mac seems pointless and over priced compared to the recently updated Studio.

And "What’s in the Box" at the bottom of the Pro page lists Mouse (or keyboard) and keyboard.
So I'm wondering if I'm even looking at the same rig as @Shaitan or @williamyf

Why stop at just picking on Silicon Valley, and by extension California's produce.
What about the car & tractor manufacturers?
The dealership lock in that's been steadily evolving over the years, as technology has become more prevalent in vehicles, needs reining in.
Too hot for the politicians to touch I think. Easier to stick it to a Democratic state than the likes of John Deere.
You're going to get e-waste regardlessly, thats just the nature of consumer computing technology and smart phones as they rapidly improve & update..
To claim it prevents tons of e-waste is just spin.
Vehicles on the other hand have a significantly longer life span and therefore repair and life extension is more applicable.

Saw same news article over on Macrumors.
I read the MR comments to gauge what the ill informed opinions are and I come here for more tech savvy ones.
So it was a nice surprise to see long time MR poster Gengar post this in the MR article comments:

I write and publish my own apps for a living, I've been doing this for about 12 years now.
Over these years I've come to realise that App user's don't really understand who it is that they purchased from.
At least the ones who've gotten in touch and asked for a refund.
They think it is my company and I can issue a refund (different with Google Play, I can because Google lets me. With Apple there's no touching their payment system).

So reading this I get why Apple is keen to emphasise who it is that a user would be making the purchase from.
I can see the potential nightmare for both users and Apple when payment support is needed and there is a 3rd party in the mix.
It's still going to happen because, again from my own experience, it doesn't matter the warnings or text you put in front of their eye balls there's going to be many who don't pay attention.
Of course Apple doesn't want to lose their 15 or 30% cut but there's also the end-to-end user experience and their brand reputation at stake here too which is much more valuable.

I personally use google search a whole lot less now in favour of my preferred LLM.
This is one of these headlines that makes me wish we had an in comment section poll pinned to the top of it rather than just reading opinions and trying to weigh the sentiment.

AI's are only as good as the material they've learned from.
I had a bug of sorts that I fixed by myself only today that I'd been trying to get the various flavours of ChatGPT to shine light on.
None gave me the answer and even when I came up with the solution and proposed it to GPT it said "yeah, sure, you are probably right but I couldn't find any references to back up your solution".
I've been writing software professionally for 35 years. AI has knowledge but lacks experience, wisdom, intuition, call it what you will.
AI is brilliant, I couldn't work without it now as it saves me so much time, but it isn't going to replace me in its current form.

I'm on a paid tier and I re-sell their AI through my software as a service to my user base.
Things haven't been great since the end of January going from almost 100% response rate to API requests to an irritating daily lump of timeouts and failed completions where their API returns garbage, nothing at all or some cloud server error from their end.
Interesting seeing that post today as I've seen no errors for 2 days now so hopefully they've got a handle on it.
Giving away free is cool, I've done it myself, but the take away lessons I learned from that are folks don't appreciate what they get for free and they will gorge themselves on it almost abusively. It'll be mostly bored people just passing time getting GPT to produce worthless crap images for amusement.
Change it to paid and behaviours and attitudes change.
Yes, the user base probably changes to a degree but the perception of value has a big factor in how people treat and use it with reverence in how/what they use it for.

I was writing something new into an app yesterday and using ChatGPT wishing it would just apply it directly instead of having to cut'n'paste, especially for re-writes.

On Xcode, for example, programmatically adding constraints to views is now so easy with ChatGPT. It used to be a tiresome, time consuming chore.
Now just tell it how you'd like it to appear and it does the constraints, I only had to cut and paste the code.
With this update I can now tell it to code, then compile it and then tell it what I like/don't like. Repeat until done in a shorter loop.

I've been writing software professionally for 35 years now since I graduated and this made my working life so much easier.
I don't see it replacing me any time soon though. It doesn't yet have the "Intelligence" the name AI claims.
Knowledge, yes. Intelligence or Wisdom? Definitely not. It lacks experience for one thing.

This weekend I lost my patience with ChatGPT (o3-mini-high) and said to it:
"You're fucking useless on this problem. I'm going to talk to Gemini..."
On the odd occasion I find myself visualising as Basil, with a branch, giving ChatGPT, as the car, a "damn good thrashing".

I keep expecting a sulk or it to have other some emotional response, which is maybe why I type that into it.
I always marvel at its calm, collected apology that I wish I could emulate myself.
Or maybe I'm poking it in an effort to see any glimpse of consciousness.

I've been publishing Apps for over 12 years now but never made significant amounts in those years until last year.
I launched a new AI feature in my most popular app, as a subscription, which has been extremely successful. Better than I'd hoped for.
The only complaints I've had from the user base is the addictiveness of it.
I could only nod my head when I saw the headline of this news article.
I'll also add to this, that 2024 was also my productive year in work output.
AI assisted coding, testing, planning, documenting and other admin done at 5-10x my normal rate.
I"m exhausted now and taking a bit of a rest from 2024.