Given that gw is just a theory and we still are in an ice age, what could go wrong? We get another ice age? This is just like the flawed argument of pascals wager

yeah - except it wasn't just my backyard - ask anyone within 10000km and you'll get the same answer. Plus grapes were very sour this year compared to 2020 and Figs did not even make it to maturity...

Must have been asleep when that happend. As a mountain biker I am very aware of the weather, since I ride almost every day for a couple of hours We had a few warm days, but all in all this was a lousy summer with plenty of cool days and lots of rain. Yet they tell us this was the warmest year since start of recordings - yeah sure... I will certainly not associate last year with any kind of climate change

from my firewall rules: ... # below for LG-TV #ACCEPT:$LOG locmed:172.16.0.63 net tcp 0:65535 #ACCEPT:$LOG locmed:172.16.0.63 net udp 0:65535 REJECT locmed:172.16.0.63 net tcp 0:65535 REJECT locmed:172.16.0.63 net udp 0:65535 ...

After the last desaster, mRNA would be an absolute no-go for anybody sane. Otoh - still lots of idiots around...

What has tipped is some peoples brains. Unfortunateley that is an irreversibe process. Btw. : we need way more of the good stuff (CO2). These damn critters in the oceans keep depleting it more and more. Just look at reefs and the south coast of England. That stuff was once food for plants and is now gone forever. I vote for a minimum of 1000ppm.

Funny, we are currently exactly at the average of 1979-2000 according to this reanalysis: https://climatereanalyzer.org/... And this is also desparate to show any warming with respect to 1981-2010: http://www.karstenhaustein.com... Particularly funny, because both use NOAA data

OMG another one of those "models". I have a model of the moon made of green cheese.

RSS is more in line with the warmists because they refuse to remove questionable data from their sets. Details are here: https://wattsupwiththat.com/20... For uah it is much less than the 0.5K difference - and looking at the temperature swings from month to month it is clearly visible that the outcome of the bet depends significantly on only a few months shift. Anybody who follows climate science knows that warmists are currently getting very nervous. Some even openly doubt the CIMP-6 predictions about the ECS range

The article says it: Given the short-term nature of the observational record, it is difficult to assess the historical importance of this mass-loss trend... ... Our simulation domain covers southwestern Greenland, the mass change of which is dominated by surface mass balance... No further reading required - another paper just to get published.

How can that be? 99% of (selected) scientists agree on global warming and so do 99% of journalists. It must be true

right - especially since this damn CO2 depletion is going on for millions of years already. Shells and plankton are already pulling out CO2 in record amounts and it is very hard to get it back into the air. The result is that plants are starving and have a hard time to survive at low CO2 levels. 75% of all CO2 is lost in limestone; we should be glad that at least some can be generated by burning fossil fuels. oh - and don't worry about the horror stories about warming - surprisingly almost all recent studies have found that the IPCC numbers are vastly overstated.

No need to massage data - just take the russian model - it matches relatively well. Unfortunately it does not predict an apocalypse, so they average it with all the other models to make up for that. And that's when the need for "homogenization" and massaging of data arises. But I'm sure that is not what people want to hear. They want to believe that the end is nigh. So let them. And listen to Marc Twain: Never get into an argument with.... you know

And where is this acceleration hidden? I cannot see it: https://www.sealevel.info/MSL_... Probably like the heat: hidden in the deep ocean. Oh - I see it's only modelled satellite data. So just as all the other models - not applicable in the real world.

just one fact is needed to counter all these arguments. Go look at the measured temperatures. Even the permanently upward adjusted GISS and NOAA curves do not show the expected warming according to the models. Currently despite the "heat wave" in Europe - the temperature anomalies go down: http://www.karstenhaustein.com... And this reanalysis-site currently shows 0.2K higher temps than the average of 1979-2000: https://climatereanalyzer.org/... I have seen it with -0.1K in June. Mind you: these sites are "alarmist" sites with temps artificially cranked up in the desperate attempts to aligns them with the models. Seems like they failed - and we don't even have a LaNina yet...