from TFA :
Over time, epistemological approaches rooted in Western traditions have come to be seen as objective and universal, rather than culturally situated or historically contingent. This has normalised Western knowledge as the standard, obscuring the specific historical and political forces that enabled its rise.
In a basic sense, this is true, but in general it is used to bamboozle people into the (incorrect) "math is racist" mindset and then to much handwringing and government spending on dumb reports
If you line up Christianity vs Islam vs Hinduism etc yes, your have different epistemological and metaphysical approaches.
But physical based science and even modern psychology and economics are both universal and generally hostile to (or at least orthogonal to) all the classic views.
Articles like this really underplay the degree to which the past is a foreign land for all of us.