Comment Re:21st Century (Score 1) 100
So did I, and I paid extra for 'Amazon Instant' delivery. Not making that mistake again.
(typing this from an anvil-shaped hole in the ground. ow.)
+1 funny.
So did I, and I paid extra for 'Amazon Instant' delivery. Not making that mistake again.
(typing this from an anvil-shaped hole in the ground. ow.)
+1 funny.
Don't try to inject real life into cartoons. (In the real world, coyotes can run nearly twice as fast a roadrunners.)
I went to my bank and one of the employees that talked to me was wearing them. Was the bank public? What was my expectation of privacy inside the bank?
That's frightening. What did the bank have to say about it?
A pervert is going to use hidden cameras that are NOT contained within well known camera equipped devices. They will use buttonhole cameras, pen cameras, and all the other various concealed cameras that have existed since long before Meta offered glasses.
Pointing out that people will do other creepy shit doesn't excuse the creepy shit we are presently discussing. If you had a broken leg you'd go to a doctor, not just ignore it because tomorrow you might break your arm.
You can't really justify banning a tool simply because a fraction of a percent decide to use it for malicious purposes.
I guess you haven't been in an airport this century. Forget "tools," you're not even allowed to bring a bottle of water through security. We can argue all day whether it's a good idea, but the point is, it happens and your taxes are paying for it.
When the next wav of feminism demands Greed turn the worlds oldest profession into a fucking stock ticker
Tobacco companies turned "feminism" into deadly marketing a hundred years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"keep their stories up for 48 hours instead of 24, send animated super reactions and super hearts to stories, preview stories without showing up as a viewer in other users' list"
Surely, they have some kind of data that says someone will pay for this, right? Is this really what people can't wait to hand over money to Facebook for? Super Reactions? "Exclusive" stickers and ringtones? I'd love to hear from someone that actually pays for that kind of stuff and what they are really getting out of it - because I REALLY don't get it.
Remember in the early 2000s when there were all those late night TV ads charging $2.99 for ringtones? I never bought one, I don't know anyone who did, but presumably there must have been somebody handing over money. Presumably those people (or their children) are making similarly poor decisions today.
I deleted my Facebook years ago
How did you do this? Last time I tried, facebook made up some kind of "device not recognised" error (even though it was the same PC I had been using for months) and demanded more PII to proceed, like a real cell number and email. Obviously I wasn't going to do that.
So now I have an orphan account I can't log into and use even if I wanted to. I guess that's almost as good as no account at all?
Non-regulated finance is nothing but an invitation to criminals of all sorts.
Cryptocurrency is a speedrun of why conventional finance has regulations.
Jensen: Burn as much money as you can buying my hardware at grossly inflated prices. I am enjoying it. If you slow down, China is going to come from behind and bite your butt off. So you better run as fast as you can to save your butt.
Amodei: I need a break, cannot run anymore. I am running out of all the borrowed money to this hardware shark. I can only slowdown if everyone else slows down. Else I risk being trampled by all those who are chasing me. Please stop! [pulls out a white cloth tied to the end of a stick. No takers]
Haha haha... nice situation.
This seems like the best summary so far.
What if LG becomes Fecebook, in the sense that they're selling you to the advertiser. What if LG start putting eSIM devices into the screens so that you get a free picture box in exchange for your preferences to sell to the advertiser? You might not notice it in the menus, but you might get product placement of some sort. It's a horrible future which I foresee.
George Orwell was an optimist. In 1984 he proposed that the government would have to force people to have telescreens in their homes. Here we are in 2026 and people eagerly pay their own money to install them on behalf of faceless advertisers... and the government do nothing to prevent it.
Indeed, that's the way some Americans see it.
Sad, in many cases it's a lack of education.
This is what happens after a half a century of sabotaging public education.
This would make me feel like a boomer, desperately seeking someone to sell him those sci-fi gadgets he was promised back in the 50s...
I can't be the only one who would feel that kind of shame and embarrassment. Obviously there are people who use these features, but I don't ever see them in public or in the workplace doing it. People seem to want to keep this kind of degrading interaction behind closed doors.
Some friends (in their 30s) bought a very expensive smart TV a couple of years ago, and they insisted on using the stupid voice thing. I have no idea why. It was consistently wrong and took much longer even than using the shitty on-screen keyboard, which I had always thought was the slowest way to interact with a TV. Nope, voice activation is even slower. Must be even worse if you have an accent.
LOL, you use a smart speaker. Intentionally allow companies in, while claiming to protect yourself from them. Oof.
They are called "smart speakers" because if they were truthfully named nobody would buy them. "Pervy microphone that records everything you say in your house and uploads it" is more accurate.
If you could download the update and install it from USB, that would be acceptable.
This would be a great compromise. Unfortunately I find it hard to see how they can add this feature to the list of features that make people buy a new TV. "Offline update capable" maybe?
Doubt is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother. - Kahlil Gibran