Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This Even Happens for In-Store Shopping (Score 1) 55

CVS drug stores sell two CVS-branded ointments that fight fungus. One is for athlete's foot, and the other is for jock itch. A tube of the jock itch ointment costs $2 more than a tube of the athlete's foot ointment. A close examination of the tubes reveals that they contain the same amounts of the same strength of the same product. They both have instructions for both kinds of fungus. Other than the names and the prices, they are the same.

There was a similar case a decade ago in Australia where the same painkiller was sold under different labels as "headache" treatment, "neck pain" treatment etc. It was all the same ingredient at the same strength, in different packets with different prices: https://www.abc.net.au/news/20...

The Australian consumer watchdog was not impressed.

Comment Re: Hope that those kids (Score 1) 135

Except nobody cares about the children. That is the false flag that this was enacted under. They want YOUR information, your identification. They will use AI to go through all of your history and come to a determination of whether or not you are a "good" citizen. If so, life continues, if not, you will find yourself getting queried deeply at every traffic stop, find it difficult to get paperwork through the government, and possibly carted off to a 'camp'. But yeah, keep arguing about whether or not children should have access to social media.

What? This is about children NOT having access to social media. So your hypothetical about using "AI to go through all of your history" would come up with zero results as a result of these laws.

Nobody is stopping anyone using a phone to make calls or send texts. Nobody is stopping anyone using email. Anyone can still encrypt their email if they want to.

The only parties who are losing access to "all of your history" are corporations like Meta and Twitter. This is a net benefit for Australian citizens.*

*It might also help protect against this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/20...

Comment Re:Good riddance. (Score 1) 135

2G/3G are dead where i live but i found 4G dumbphones on Amazon. On top of my head there were nokia and panasonic ones.

The ones I have seen (e.g Nokia 2720) had access to the KaiOS app store, and also have apps pre-installed, including Google Voice Assistant and Whatsapp. I had to root my 2720 to get rid of that crap.

I guess it depends on one's definition of a "dumbphone," even the old Nokias had games on them :-) I like having a 4G hotspot so I can use the phone to give internet access to a real computer, and I can see how the shitty built-in camera is useful e.g in the event of an accident etc.

The predictive text also SUCKS. Way more laggy than an old Nokia 3310, and handling capital letters is much more fiddly. The phone is nice and small though, and the battery life is good unless you live in an area with marginal signal. If the phone can't hear a tower it will max out its TX power and flatten the battery in ~24h.

Comment Re:And little of value was lost (Score 2) 135

Yes, there are a few useful corners of social media.

And you could watch symphonies on TV too. And educational stuff. But kids didn't, did they? Or those who did were a rounding error.

And then of course there's the fact that social media is a million times worse than TV ever was. You wouldn't let your kids wander down every dark alley of every city on earth, so why would you let them wander every corner of the internet?

Social media is a sewer. Sometimes gold gets flushed in there, but if you go looking for the gold you'll be up to your neck in shit.

Comment Re:am i missing something (Score 1) 135

are phone calls and texts counted as social media therefore also banned?

No, the phone still works as a phone. Emails still work. Kids are not being "silenced" or "censored."

Any legislation that annoys Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg at the same time is probably a good idea. While I disagree with many, many things the .au government has done, I think this is in general a positive step.

Comment Re:Won't work but needs to be done (Score 1) 135

I bet the EU is watching closely.

This is tackling a complex problem with a hammer. There are workarounds, there will be collateral damage. Sure. But businesses are there to make money, not look after people and societies. We know they'll happily do any amount of social, environmental and personal harm in the interests of profit. So governments have to protect their citizens, however imperfectly that turns out to be. If a government / regulatory system is any good, you don't allow a pesticide factory to be built beside a school, but you do allow the factory to be built somewhere.

So, I think it's also completely reasonable. Governments have got to do something, and this is a starting point. The idea that you can come up with a perfect solution to a complex problem is childish. So is the idea that because of this you don't even try. You have a go and refine and keep chasing a moving target, and it's never all that good but it's better than doing nothing.

It all has to start with recognising that something needs to be done, and with not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. (Or is not good, better.)

I've already posted on here so I can't mod you up.

And yes, Europe is watching closely: https://www.abc.net.au/news/20...

Comment Re:Good riddance. (Score 1) 135

Kids should have communities in real life, where people behave less like assholes. Under light supervision of adults. And a little bit of supervised internet on a family PC in a common room, not in their own bedrooms. My kids have dumbphones used for SMS and phone calls.

Hard to find a proper dumbphone in Australia. The 2G and 3G networks have both been shut down, so that old Nokia in the drawer won't work. Millions of phones and plenty of other infrastructure turned into e-waste.

Comment Re: Hope that those kids (Score 4, Insightful) 135

But what you're saying is that, rather than being able to have your own discretion, the government made the choice for you. One of the important parts of growing up is learning how to use your discretion.

The government doesn't allow people under 16 to drive cars, drink alcohol or vote either.

Comment Re:shame on you slashdot (Score 1) 237

Slashdot's mod system is not perfect, but it is better than most. They can spout whatever nonsense they want, you don't have to see any of their posts, or even know they posted something. It's like you can personally shadow ban them, and see less things that upset you.

It's amazing that after all these years other sites haven't cottoned on. Maybe precisely because it *is* better and harder to gamify.

Comment Re:they don't know... (Score 1) 62

They're still making DVD drives. They're just mostly USB now. Ripping is pushbutton easy these days. No messing around with getting a copy of DeCSS and such.

HandBrake is great! So much easier than DVDdecrypter/VOBdec/Flask and the delicate stack of codecs we seemed to need back in the day. Yes, a USB bluray/DVD/CD writer can be had easily these days for a decent price. There's probably still a decent side hustle in ripping, transcoding or backing up optical media. While I'm sure some of the kids can do it themselves, I bet there are plenty who would just pay someone else to do it, just like 20 years ago.

Comment Re:Where did it come from. (Score 2) 99

Aviation sounds like an authoritarian's dream hobby. Up to its eyebrows in regulation, oversight, and general ass kissing / brown nosing to curry favor.

The latter exists anywhere there is the former, but there are good and obvious reasons why aircraft should have to be highly regulated.

Unless they weigh less than 254 pounds: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

It's kinda cool that a person can bolt something together and fly it legally without ANY certification or instruction. I mean, I'm not going to try it myself, and I don't necessarily want an uncertified aircraft to fly over my house, but it's still cool that there's a carve-out in the regulation so that people are *allowed* to do it.

Comment Re: Not new info (Score 1) 201

no we haven't. Oil or water base? which pigments? organic or inorganic? The types of ink are numerous!

Making blanket statements without scientific tests of each type of ink is meaningless, junk science.

Often we don't know the ingredients. Are they listed on the bottle of ink? Does the tattoo shop give you this list before they inject it into you? Are you sure the tattoo shop doesn't add stuff to their ink to make it "better"?

The researchers have to work with the information they have been able to find. If they have found that in particular cases, with particular kinds of ink, there's an immune effect, that in itself is not "meaningless, junk science."

Comment Re:backup beepers? (Score 2) 64

Good idea, but you'd also need a pretty robust safety verification mechanism, showing that the vehicles are indeed in an area where they can turn safety features off, with no humans accidentally in the area.

We already have a satellite-based positioning system, that can tell the position of a receiver anywhere on the globe. This can be verified with a short-range radio system like bluetooth - just put a transponder in the charging stations. And finally, don't these autonomous cars already have robust detection of humans? Detecting humans then refraining from mowing them down near a charging station seems no different to detecting humans on sidewalks or crosswalks. Easier perhaps, because the vehicles should only be moving very slowly.

If Waymo haven't implemented all of the above, it's not because it's some kind of sci-fi impossibility. It's because they are greedy scum and were hoping to get away without even paying for a junior engineer to utilise the systems already built into the vehicles for exactly this purpose.

Comment Re:CliffsNotes for a new generation (Score 1) 89

More often, I find myself mining the responses for their sources. But I can often find the same sources much faster using a web search. So, what is the benefit here again?

We can do the same with Wikipedia. Wikipedia gives you a nice summary, and lists all the sources so you can read more. It also uses a shitload less electricity than a commercial LLM. I suspect the only "benefit" of using an LLM is for the owners of that LLM.

Comment Re:Rubbish (Score 1) 124

every conversation huh

what's the rate on that?

As someone who manages something 1/100th of the size, I'd absolutely believe that they missed it.

Don't get me wrong... I'm not saying you're wrong that they would make this decision given the functional opportunity, I'm saying that they have a vested interest in making you believe they actually vet more than a tiny percentage of conversations and they haven't actually demonstrated the capability.

They literally write software that analyses colossal volumes of written text. I think they can handle reading what the users of ChatGPT type in.

Also, just like GMail and Facebook, that's where the value is - the stuff the users are feeding in. That's how you find out the best ways to advertise or sway voting preferences.

Slashdot Top Deals

To communicate is the beginning of understanding. -- AT&T

Working...