Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment They'll probably be fine (Score 1) 88

The thing about massive oil wealth is that it's massive. Even if this project fails, Saudi Arabia will still have massive piles of money. They can afford to have a few bets simply not pay out.

But yeah, the Norwegians seem to be getting more value out of their sovereign wealth fund. If I got to choose my citizenship, I know which country I'd choose.

And I also know which countries the customers should choose when they make decisions about where to buy their oil from, and what regimes to prop up.

Comment Re:How will I know (Score 1) 155

...if my card is accepted until I get up the cashier and then find out that I can't pay for my items. This is a terrible idea.

I carry cash. If the store won't accept it, I politely say "sorry, I didn't realise you don't accept real money" then walk straight out, leaving my purchases on the counter, and never go back. There are a couple of bars in town and one coffee truck that I no longer visit, which is a penalty I am prepared to accept. I also occasionally have smaller stores round-down the price, leading to a direct saving for me. If such a saving is offered, I graciously accept this (not my place to tell them how to run their business, and I really do appreciate it) but I never ask for a cash discount. I value living in a country where the printed price is not negotiable, haggling over every transaction is inefficient.

Comment Re: Rejecting my card... (Score 1) 155

One Bitcoin wallet can be used at any merchant in the world supporting Bitcoin. If the American banking industry can't figure this out after 70 years, they deserve to lose their business.

True, but not really relevant in 2025. In 2012 I hoped that more merchants would accept cryptocurrency in order to force the likes of Visa/Mastercard to improve their scummy business tactics. This doesn't seem to have happened and crypto seems to be just a way for online scammers to launder their takings, and people with inside knowledge to do old-fashioned insider trading on the cryptocurrency of choice. Not to mention the carbon footprint.

Comment Re: anti-consumer [head games] (Score 1) 155

Wrongo, but funny story. I did get a debit card a couple of years ago and eventually got rid of all my credit cards. Last month I tried to buy something to discover that it is ONLY possible to buy it with a credit card. So far I've wasted a couple of weeks trying to find out why, but my top theory is that they insist on having an "active" credit rating for reasons still unclear. Or might be a PI abuse scam? Also spent some of that time researching the options for credit cards, but that's paradox-of-choice territory now. I remember one particular credit card company website with a list of 70 different credit cards... Talk about head games.

However I was mostly thinking about grocery stores. There are four local ones that I do business with, and each of them has wildly different loyalty card schemes with various kinds of points and bogus incentives. Lesser thinking was about Rakuten Mobile, which uses a bizarre mix of coupons and points and special offers to confuse the bejesus out of wannabe customers. (Or a former wannabe customer in my case, but one who can't yet find a better option...)

I had the same issue when trying to rent a car last year. I tried to walk away from the deal when the counter agent told me this, (I would have literally had to walk!) but (like most rental car bookings) I had reserved the vehicle online and already paid a deposit. So they had me over a barrel. In this case I still had an overseas credit card, which I had to use and eat the foreign-transaction fee at the end of the month.

I asked the agent why it made sense that they would refuse a domestic debit card (with plenty of money in the account!) but accept a foreign credit card, but couldn't get a sensible answer beyond "that's our policy, produce a card or go away and eat the prepaid booking fee." I mean, the agent already literally had my drivers license and passport in her hand, I don't see how it could be related to "security" or "identity verification." If I was allowed to use the card to make the reservation and pay in advance, I should be allowed to use the same card when collecting the vehicle in person. In fact, being required to use that same card makes sense in terms of security, though it would obviously be a hassle for e.g business trips where your employer makes the reservation.

Needless to say, I will never use Budget or Nu ever again.

Comment Re:That's one (big) reason I haven't gotten ... (Score 1) 123

... a Vacubot yet, even though they're getting cheaper and better to the point of actually being useful.

No effing way am I going to let some Internet of Trash device load excessive amounts of very personal and private data to some anonymous computer in the cloud. Obviously.

The older vacubots didn't do any of this. I have a Roomba from 2012. It's still going strong and doesn't have *any* telemetry. No idea if you can still buy something similar, I don't know what I'll do when this one finally dies because I don't want any of the new spy vacuums in my house either.

Comment Re:How stupid... (Score 1) 123

Given that it needs said maps to do its job, and that every other robot vac does the same thing for the same reason, it's not that big a deal.

I have had a robot vacuum cleaner for over a decade. It doesn't do any mapping, never has, and doesn't need to in order to do its job of driving around the floors sucking up dirt. No wifi, no camera, no lidar. Just a couple of IR sensors for proximity and cliff, and a bump sensor as a backup for the IR.

Comment Re:Fix the grid (Score 1) 62

The obvious fix is for (local) governments to install batteries in neighborhoods, but I wouldn't count on that happening too much. Them being a little slow on the uptake is a big part in the cause of this issue.

Here are three in Canberra: https://www.act.gov.au/our-can...

Comment Re:Best way to use the electricity? (Score 1) 62

I'm thinking that there is some cost-effective life improving way to use the free electricity beyond normal household operation and beyond buying an expensive battery system.

Distilling your own drinking water to remove the toxins and microplastics?

I mentioned this above, but a "thermal battery" is pretty straightforward to do at home. At its simplest, this can be as simple as heating your domestic hot water system when the electricity is free. Hot water stores well for 24+ hours, it can be used for bathing/washing, or if you store enough of it, for heating. For Australians in hot areas, I could see storage of "cold" becoming common. For example, chilled brine that is used for cooling in the evenings during the "duck curve."

On a larger scale, I believe that the big coastal desalination plants are indeed throttled to take advantage of the cheap times for electricity.

Comment Re:UBE (Score 1) 62

The thing people need to realize is that PV panels die, quickly. They will not last the life of the building if they are installed permanently to a home. You will need to replace the solar panels every 10 years, or at least have them inspected. Hopefully some recent tech that has come out recently makes it so that solar panels are much more efficient. Perovskite solar cells are a new development but 50% better than current ones, which might actually make it viable to have PV in northern locations.

The panels that came with our house (we moved there in 2012, the panels were installed some time before that) are just fine. There was a big hailstorm in 2020 that cracked roof tiles and dented cars, but the solar panels are still fine. Peak power is down maybe 10% over those 13+ years.

Comment Re:In Holland you get a fine from the utility comp (Score 1) 62

As someone who has solar I can say its best suited to retired people if your working and the kids are in school solar power goes to waste unless you have good but expensive batteries (the cheap ones have had recall warnings due to fire risk). And don't say you can schedule your washing machine for when the sun shines thats only one load per day as no one is there to put the next load in.

Electric hot water is a big load. With a 300L tank you can store a day's worth of hot water for the whole family, and heat it in whichever part of the day is cheap/free.

You mention retirees but there are also professionals who work from home, or even stay-at-home parents, though I'll concede the latter are more rare than they used to be.

Comment Re:Summon MacMann (Score 1) 183

You realize that's a "the solution to pollution is dilution" argument, right? The problem is not the heating of the entire Atlantic ocean. Do you now that the house I live in is built on the Earth. That's a pretty huge thermal mass. If my house catches fire, it's not going to be noticeable in how it affects the heat of planet Earth. I might have some reasons to be concerned about the local effects, however. So, if you're not sure about the analogy there, the problem is locally where the hot water, which rises, heats the top layer of water.

Also, I should note that the _electrical_ output of Flamaville is 1.3 GW, but that translates to a _thermal_ output of about 4 GW. That's enough to raise the temperature of nearly a million liters of water by 1 degree C every second. Or say an area of 1 square km and one meter deep (once again, hot water tends to rise to the top) by 3.6 degrees C every hour. It is not trivial for the area around the outlet and, combined with all of those phosphate and iron containing pollution you mentioned, certainly risks creating giant, toxic algal blooms that kill off mass numbers of local sea life. Basically, it is clear that this nuclear station only exists because it is grandfathered. It's not like the other pollution you mentioned is OK, either, but there are good reasons not to allow this sort of thing

If you have a better idea for getting rid of the waste heat from a power station, I'd love to hear it. So far the answers (for ANY power station, including solar) are
1. The atmosphere.
2. Local waterways (rivers, cooling ponds etc)
3. The ocean.

Comment Re:Summon MacMann (Score 1) 183

Even a gigawatt of heat is pretty minimal compared to the thermal mass of the English Channel. And the channel is hardly a closed system - it disperses through the entire Atlantic Ocean. I think the output of Flamanville is a rounding error in the thermal budget of that system. The ocean is pretty much the best place on the planet to dump heat.

Comment Re:Summon MacMann (Score 1) 183

It just dumps its thermal pollution right into the English channel.

The English Channel is disgusting. Loads of untreated sewage from the UK every time they have a bit of rain in England. Industrial pollution. Discarded war materiel. A bit of warm water is pretty minor on the list of "nasty crap in the English Channel."

Slashdot Top Deals

A physicist is an atom's way of knowing about atoms. -- George Wald

Working...