When there's an emerging / evolving industry, the leaders of that industry often lobby for regulation once they gain a foothold, as it creates barriers for competitors who could otherwise get in on the game by merely raising enough capital.

This, in turn, allows smaller enterprises to take on the risk of innovation while established corporations consolidate market share and wait to acquire the ones who break through the barriers with truly novel innovations.

All the reason to scream louder. I'm all for it.

That doesn't mean drawing outrage and attention to it isn't useful. If bad corporate behavior isn't verified and amplified, no action will be taken against it.

No, Ken. That did not escape me, and I made a point to highlight that, sorry it escaped you.

An FTC that works harder on behalf of advertisers than it does on behalf of consumers.

Not that they're wrong, but it's pretty telling that this is their focus when everyday people are being screwed over left and right by these too-big-for-accountability mega corps.

He went from being unfathomably, criminally wealthy to unfathomably criminally wealthy.

It would have been nice for the summary to at least clue in people who are unfamiliar with what KVM is in this context. overview was painful enough to read that after the first sentence, I didn't care.

Uhmmm.. because you apparently are not the gatekeeper of what "matters" to nerds?

For context, here are the most active stories of all time from the hall of fame (link in footer of site):

5687 Kerry Concedes Election To Bush by timothy
4183 Strike on Iraq by CmdrTaco
3709 Barack Obama Wins US Presidency by CmdrTaco
3468 Six Bomb Blasts Around Central London by Zonk
3451 Equal Time For Creationism by Zonk
3360 Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
3315 The Pseudoscience of Intelligent Design by Hemos
3314 Saddam Hussein Arrested by CmdrTaco
3265 Fahrenheit 9/11 Discussion by CmdrTaco
3212 What's Keeping You On Windows? by Cliff

You must be new here, or not paying attention to the site for the past 30 years, and that's Okay.

"The important thing is that some dingbat academician got a publishing credit."

Tell me you didn't read the paper without telling me you didn't read the paper.

" even just reading the summary "

Ahh. There it is. Sounds like how a dingbat might react.

When these too-big-to-fail bloodsuckers can no longer support themselves and need a government handout they won't be able to cry about the jobs lost if they tank.
I would absolutely love to see Intuit bite the big one. They're an unnecessary middle man to so many financial systems. Their business model is to literally add their own tax to taxes while providing very little value.

Why should I care if it's China or some US-Based global company that is violating my privacy?

I'd be all aboard this argument if it meant that US companies were not just as scummy with my personal info. Spoiler alert, if it is profitable, then they are.

Ford doesn't care about me being exploited. They just care that they're not the ones getting rich doing it.