Reading the OpenAI PDF, I conclude that watermarking is steering the answer in a way, and so the choice of words might not be the best the model could use, slightly lowering the quality of the output.

The PDF: https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/e95...

I wonder how the watermarking could be revealed without access to the original model it was generated on. I guess this is a requirement: only OpenAI can assess this, right?

"since it is present in greater concentrations in water than in the air"

And so, why didn't they use one of the source instead? From the coal plants it's 300x more.

This might be useful for another interpretation of the particle entanglement: no instantaneous state transmission, but normal speed transmission of some influence back in time to set the value? Or does it not even work with that?

I consider them as "Personal Terminal"

It's really very personal.

And it's an all-in-one Internet terminal. Most of the applications require Internet.

This leaves the camera feature, but I would be ok with the name.

> unaware slow-moving doom scrollers

Dealing with people moving with their eyes (nose) on the screen is especially difficult and annoying.

They made a special walk lane for them in Asia somewhere, years ago (one place, one city).

I'd like to have:

* A name for them, like you said

* A strategy. Currently I decided they have the lowest priority, and so I barge in, even if they collide a bit it doesn't really matter because they are unaware and just correct themselves.

Wouldn't it be more effective to not release CO2 that mined coal would emit by burying it back in the ground?

And yes, that sounds a bit silly, but it highlights how silly this whole thing is.

Next logical idea would be to not dig out the coal from the mines, and instead sell the biochar to clients that would have bought the coal to burn it.

This reminds me people interested in pumping back the very dilluted CO2 from the atmosphere, with a complex and costly process, while there are concentrated CO2 sources (coal plants) that are ignored, and natural means to pump this CO2 (forests). Silly projects.

I never left KDE. Too bad Linux Mint has dumped (as an integrated flavor).

That said, the KDE team did something against the users: removing the ability to set the window's border width & color, and the gradient & color & 3D texture for the window's title bar. (I'm against the flat design for clarity)

It's maddening how developers remove user's freedom, and in the GNU/Linux ecosystem, no less... The Gnome team is one of the worst here. Firefox is next.

Sorry for the rant.

I can believe this silly scam is back and nobody yells to them:

Pump it from coal plant exhaust instead of the atmosphere!

CO2 in air: 0.04% , hard to capture in large quantity;
CO2 in coal plant exhaust: 14% (vol) : much more effective.

It goes into the atmosphere anyway if you don't capture it, why are you waiting for it to be diluted from 14 to 0.04 !!!

It looks like people were looking for something and methodically swept the ground on a large scale.

These lines would then have no meaning in themselves.

Were they looking for treasure, were they trying to collect all the rocks of a meteorite?

Could this tool support also non-human characters like elves?

If it's just a matter of pointy ears it should be okay.

Maybe not for beastfolk and oni, since there's no horns option I guess. No furry ears neither...

No they can't because to read the teleported quantum states they need additional information that is sent through classic channels, not faster than light.

Why is this forgotten every time?

... intent.

There is a difference between a game depicting some reality where there is sexism, and a game made by sexist people who promote sexism.

That's why the sexism rating should be two ratings:

One rating for how much sexist clichés there are in the game, has there are in real life.
One rating for how much the game could induce sexist behavior, as it may be done on purpose by sexist people.

(this late posting is more a note to myself...)

Our car is badly scratched. It's second hand and one of us made additional scratch to it (non intentional).

I don't think anyone would be interested in robing such a car and we feel quite relaxed regarding theft risk (and when going through tight places).