Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Unintended consequences... (Score 1) 100

I know you're being sarcastic, but the first time I read this I was horrified.

https://cepr.net/newsroom/new-...

A new study published in the British medical journal The Lancet Global Health finds that unilateral economic sanctions lead to about 564,000 excess deaths around the world each year. The findings, by economists Mark Weisbrot, Francisco Rodríguez, and Silvio Rendón, show that this human toll is roughly equivalent to total deaths from wars, including civilian casualties, and is more than the annual number of battle-related casualties.

Most of the sanctions-related deaths in the five decades after 1970 were children under the age of five.

Comment Re:Damn republicans and their woke solar (Score 1) 98

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co...

Exports of Western nuclear technology and equipment to China are under heavy sanction by Western governments.

The Chinese nuclear industry responded by building an ecosystem and supply chain that is almost entirely domestic, and self-sufficient.

This was shocking even to top Western experts, who now concede that China's nuclear programs are best in class, while the industry is stagnating in North America and Europe.

Consequently, China's universities for nuclear engineering now lead the world.

China also seems to have broken the "Cost Escalation Curse" that typifies power projects elsewhere. Chinese firms build new plants far more quickly, and at far lower price points, than were believed possible.

China is now exporting reactors, technology, and talent to friendly countries, while Western regulators are closing off its access to more affordable and faster Chinese tech.

Comment Re:Damn republicans and their woke solar (Score 1) 98

I've noticed in the past that you seem consistently to denigrate anything that points at China having advanced at all since the 1980s, I'd encourage you to check out Kevin Wamsley's Substack page. Yes, he's exceedingly optimistic but his articles are backed by voluminous documentation. This one is pertinent to the current discussion.

https://kdwalmsley.substack.co...

Comment No. (Score 1) 3

Well don't worry because right now you're only dumb. A human brain cannot be conscious without a LOT of biological resources that ensure most of it is functioning and both electrically and chemically active, both things that these brains don't have. Your concerns are about as warranted as concerns that you might wake up as an LLM because an LLM was trained on your slashdot posts.

Submission + - Microsoft Deliberately Bricking All Office for Mac 2019/2021 Installations (osnews.com) 2

joshuark writes: MacOS users who opted to buy a copy of Microsoft Office for macOS back in 2019 or 2021, eschewing the Office 365 subscription, so you could keep on using Office 2019/2021 forever if you wanted to. Just like in the old days.

Consumer Rights Wiki reports:

"Microsoft Office 2019 and 2021 for Mac view-only conversion (2026) is a scheduled remote degradation of perpetually-licensed Microsoft Office software for macOS and iOS, set for July 13, 2026 when a license-validation certificate used by the Office apps expires.[1] After Office 2019 for Mac reached end of support in October 2023, Microsoft assured customers their installed apps would "continue to function."[2] The July 13, 2026 conversion instead drops the apps into a Microsoft-defined "reduced functionality mode," in which files can be opened and viewed but not edited or saved.[1][3] By May 30, 2026, the original 2023 end-of-support page had been re-dated and rewritten on Microsoft's site; the "continue to function" clause was removed.[4][2]" https://consumerrights.wiki/w/...

Microsoft’s advice to the users they’re stealing from is to keep using the applications as mere viewers, switch to the free Office 365 web applications, pay for a 365 subscription, or buy a brand new regular copy of Office 2024. None of these make any sense, and clearly, all of this should be illegal, but it’s not because the software industry is a clown show.

Comment Re:Less legacy infrastructure, Easier to run local (Score 1) 128

All of your pseudo-'concerns' are being dealt with, by whatever method is most appropriate for the locality.

As far as solar panels in Tornado Alley, go ask the operators of the giant solar and wind farms being constructed in Texas. Besides, there's nowhere in Africa which gets tornadoes or hurricanes like the southern US anyway.

Comment Re:Less legacy infrastructure, Easier to run local (Score 1) 128

One of the issues with integrating renewable energy into the North American grid is the 'sunk cost' of all that cruft of installed hardware. Another is the accounting/tax requirements, and yet another is the organizational structures of the US energy system. Transformers are expected to last 20+ years for example, no executive is going to forgo their quarterly bonus by replacing "dumb" transformers that haven't been fully depreciated for "smart" ones that can deal with variable energy flows.

There aren't any of those obstructions in Africa. Much of the continent is essentially "green fields" construction, which is always an order of magnitude easier to deal with.

Comment Massive size. (Score 2) 38

This is a very cool and worthy project but damn if they didn't build this thing terribly because it's 179 gigabytes. I would love to tell you why exactly it's bloated as hell (I have some good guesses) but I can't even view the contents because you have to download it as a 127GiB zip file! To be honest, I'm pretty sure about 5GiB is actual OS data while the rest is an ungodly amount of packaging.

I have no doubt there is a better way to accomplish this task because this is obscene.

Slashdot Top Deals

I THINK MAN INVENTED THE CAR by instinct. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

Working...