Wealthy is relative. When I lived in Africa for 30 months in the mid 1980s, I was (as a white man) presumed to be very wealthy by a far higher percentage of people than I was in the USA. And in fact, relatively speaking, I probably was far wealthier. I found a lot of "fast friends" were attracted to engaging with me, some out of common decency to make outsiders feel welcome, but others definitely on the bet that if they befriended me they could ask for a loan or a favor.
Naturally, the more people are trying to "make friends" with you, the more discerning you have to be in accepting those friendships. If I was a billionaire in the USA, I imagine there'd be similarities.
The issue is that the leaked emails were stolen and are being released by an actor with the capability of altering them (replacing the word "didn't" with "did" for example, or deleting context). If you cannot eliminate the potential for contaminated data, then you cannot either confirm or deny. So no, it isn't the Dog that Didn't Bark. If the press or HRC or Podesta says "these are real" and then a fake one is found, how do you go back and undo that?
If it is Russia, they will certainly release all real ones until the final week, and then who knows? What if we all accept they are "of course real" and report on them as such and then one appears the last minute (insulting Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Nevada, NC etc) that alters a swing state?
The logical spiral is kind of interesting.
Read the links. This was a "cyber-bullying" law basically copied from similar USA attempts to stop "cyber-bullying". From that, a silly blog is written and then submitted as TFA by a
My guess isn't that it comes from Indonesia's peaceful Muslims, but by some sectarian Indonesian graduate of a California liberal arts program. But I don't know that, I'm only able to recognize my own confirmation bias.
I manage an electronics recycling company. We are all hand disassembly, but even we have seen lithium battery fires. The companies which switched to shredding (to reduce labor costs) have had a serious and growing problem with fires from charged lithium batteries exposed to oxygen.
We use this youtube video for staff training
If Earth launched a satellite precisely enough at the direction of the HD164595, and sufficient time elapsed for the distance to make earth's solar orbit fall in the range of the satellite's broadcast, and the satellite was sending communications back towards earth in its trail, could we not prank some future generation by not recording the launch? And how exactly do we know that wasn't done to us? Soviet Russia would have valued being the only ones to know that a signal wasn't coming from aliens, for example. Or some USA billionaire could have planned it, or rogue NASA could have calculated its eventual transmission would increase NASA funding...
If we translate the signal and it says that a Kardasian Prince needs us to transfer money in order to release millions of dollars from his account, it's a bad sign.
Any program which runs right is obsolete.