Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment the real answer is openAI hires incompetent people (Score 4, Insightful) 76

Both openAI and anthropic seem to have incompetents running their tech teams. There is absolutely no way that senior IT professionals with even a moderate of understanding of security moats/walls and especially tripwire triggers wouldn't be able to contain AI. Hell, worst-case you cold sandbox it and drip feed an internet connection. These people are just hiring in their village and are clueless as to what it to takes to build a safe frontier LLM. Worse, most dont even know how to develop code and are just having AI do it all for them.

Comment it's not just CEOs it's any "VPs, Directors ..." (Score 1) 76

I've met many inept AI VP/Directors in startups that think they know everything it's stunning. When you talk to them, and explain all the AI tools, capabilities you've developed they shrug. Then say something stupid like "have you enabled "skills" on openclaw, and when you say no because they are not relevant for the work they brush you aside. It's bizarre - I've never seen more incompetence and arrogance in my entire career.

Comment META is doing this to make them quit (Score 5, Interesting) 93

It's part of the layoff handbook. It's far less expensive to reduce your workforce if you upset your employees, make them miserable and they quit. You save severance, and numerous of "benefit" overheads. So they are making them miserable to be able to push them out. I'd guess the true target for META reduction is close to 40% of employees released in this wave. Majority replaced by AI, or pretty robots to replace the "pretty" faces. Then after the 40% they'll go for another 40%, with AI outpacing employees at every turn. META's ultimate goal is to only have execs, and some high-level AI engineers. Get it down to 10% of the headcount it is today. So the goal is 7k employees coordinating 100 AI "bots" each.

Slashdot Top Deals

The disks are getting full; purge a file today.

Working...