Comment Q: Why do you need smart glasses? (Score 1) 141
A: Because tech companies need to sell you shit! BUY! BUY! BUY!
A: Because tech companies need to sell you shit! BUY! BUY! BUY!
For one, the clip-ons would have to have all the compute and battery sitting on the front of your face, which would be uncomfortable. You need the arms to hold some of the magic sand.
I guess you could make a weird clip-on with ballast in the back, but I can easily see why they wouldn't. It's also another thing that can go wrong (alignment with existing lenses).
Thank you for your service!
Yes, it is a sacred event commemorating when Jesus and the disciples rocked their ROG XBox Ally-Xes and scored big on the leaderboards.
Early on they had only five frags and two flag captures, but by the end of the match the number of frags was enough to pwn all the other noobs, which numbered at least 5,000.
Look upon your Masters, and despair...
Move fast and break things.
Anyone affected by the breach will receive one (1) free year of credit monitoring which will automatically renew at the standard rate of $999.99/year!
0.03 * 7 = 0.21
The gluten-free thing fucks over actual celiac people too, since companies (generally not the big ones that are afraid of lawsuits, but think small bakeries) want to grab that hip and trendy gluten-free market without necessarily being strict about it.
There was a case of a farmers market stall selling "gluten-free bread" that was just regular bread. It took months, but eventually an actual celiac person ate some and almost died.
How is this relevant at all?
"Lobsters are poisonous."
"No they're not! I ate one and I was just fine."
"OK so you could afford to eat lobster and it helped you understand they were not poisonous. Many people cannot afford lobster."
> bugthesda
fwiw, the oblivion remake was outsourced.
Presumably, the combination of having a birth rate below the replacement rate as well as a new anti-immigration policy should help somewhat on the demand side.
Perhaps bulldozing some national forests would help too.
That's a good point.
Apart from a few luxuries like housing, purchasing power has not declined but rather stagnated.
Yeah, so games have gotten cheaper but American purchasing power has degraded even more.
Actually this applies to everything. Funny, that.
In 1985, the NES cost about $200 and games cost about $50 on release.
The business model has always been that the console is the "sunk cost," and the real profits come from the walled garden of games.
This is nothing new.
Friction is a drag.