Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:All the data means all the data (Score 5, Insightful) 235

Your evidence is as strong as the evidence that "the jews control the media" because some CEO of a public company has a jewish last name. Someone jumping between government appointments and the press is NOT new, what do you think political consultants are? I personally think they should change their title to out of work politician. Do you expect presidents to hire non journalists for a press secretary position?

Seriously you act like you expect people to have a special job called presidential press secretary, even though there is only one of them and they change with every president and that after they leave they should never ever work again and certainly not in the press. After all they are just robots with no independent thought and are just arms of some giant presidential monster. In other words your argument is childish and devoid of reality.

Comment Re:Pile it on.. (Score 2) 235

Being called a dick for saying dickish things does not chill discourse. Your speech has social consequences and if you believe that those social consequences are a problem than you are frankly not in tune with reality. There is no belief in free speech that includes a right not to be offended and there is also no right to not be criticized.

People like you will in one breath disclaim the right to be offended and attempt to defend the right to say offending things without the social consequences those statements bring. Both quell free speech. You have a right to say whatever you want, but you don't have a right to be free of social consequences for saying unpopular things. Because the only way to take away social consequences is to take away the freedom of other people.

Your a big boy, you say things other people don't like you better damn well expect them to react in ways you probably aren't going to like. Welcome to Freedom, part of being free is understanding that your freedom to be a dick comes with the consequences of people not wanting to associate with you and calling you names. You want to wear the big boy pants and say things other people find offensive you can be a big boy and deal with the consequences of doing so.

Comment Re:Here's the real reason for Nvidia's complaints (Score 0) 58

HPC is not GPU. It's a whole other area of computing that has little if anything to do with graphics. The Knights landing chips are kinda like a GPU in the sense that there are lots of tiny cores good at one or two operations but it differs significantly from a standard GPU type chip that Nvidia produces in that its x86, and it's cores are a little more general purpose than a standard nvidia CUDA core.

Think of it this way, Knights Landing is marketed as 70 Atom-like cores, rather than 1200 CUDA cores. Because it's x86 you don't need a Xeon in there running command and control for the CUDA cores. The Knights Landing chip can run all on it's own and it has the interconnects and shared memory to run all those atom cores at full pace such that it can do the matrix math just like CUDA but without any of the overhead of a Xeon cpu and PCIE Cuda cores coordinating across the PCIe bus. The advantage is supposed to be that because KL is x86 you don't need to recompile the code to CUDA to get it to run while at the same time getting the same power as an Nvidia build at half the cost.

Clearly KL is making waves or nvidia wouldn't be complaining. The cost of recompiling is massive, being able to run older software on these is a huge advantage, even if you can't get the same speed, especially because it's cheaper than the equivalent nvidia build.

Comment Re:Hmmm. (Score 1) 58

They all do it. Nvidia is notorious for it, probably more so than Intel, going so far as to bin chips and creating special review boards and firmwares that make the review cards 30% faster than the retail versions.

This is nothing more than a Pot meet kettle moment. Intel must be making waves in HPC with Phi to draw this strong of an Nvidia comment.

Comment Re:Ridiculous Argument (Score 1) 137

Why should I have to rent a box to access the content I'm paying for?

This initiative is SOLELY about opening up the box market to prevent the consumer gouging that Comcast and the other providers are engaged in. The FCC had a good plan with Cablecard but the problem was to implement it they allowed the cable companies to put a "certification laboratory" approval in front of anyone trying to sell compatible devices. On top of that they then started charging monthly fees for a cable card. These two things sunk cable card. Cable labs allowed them to raise the cost of device approval to the point that it wasn't worth the CE firms time and the cable companies made cable card use a nightmare such that almost everyone just gave up.

What the FCC is trying to do here is admirable. The cable companies oppose this because of a few key issues. The first is the lost box rental fee's. The second is the lost viewer data and the third is the lost advertising revenue. Comcast alone makes billions of dollars on the rental fee's and who knows how much selling access to viewer data and in box advertising. They also are the gateway to any in box competition, such as refusing to allow Netflix to run on their platform.

Anyway you slice it the current market encourages cable company abuse. The FCC needs to step in and allow open consumer access to purchased content.

Comment Re:But nothing about forcing them... (Score 1) 90

The interesting side is believing some story that the city won't allow them. Everytime I've encountered that story it generally of the order of "the city wouldn't let us install a pedestal that electrocuted anyone that touched it" or "the city wouldn't let me drape a cable across the pavement" or some other equally asinine reason. The city wants Comcast to provide service, but just like any other entity they have to comply with the laws. Typically what happens is that Comcast decides complying with city ordinances, the same ones everyone else has to comply with is too hard and that they need to change.

It's a bunch of hogwash, the real reason Comcast doesn't provide service to that street is likely every building on it has signed exclusive agreements with centurylink, which would be the reason the DSL speed is so shitty, why upgrade when you can just pay the landlords money to exclude the competition. Then when someone calls to complain do the typical and blame the local government.

Slashdot Top Deals

This restaurant was advertising breakfast any time. So I ordered french toast in the renaissance. - Steven Wright, comedian

Working...