Not every instance of slop is AI.

Just like not every instance of fraud is a Ponzi scheme.

Know your taxonomies!

People don't know the difference between exponential growth and a logistic curve.

"obvious lens reflections"

So what you're saying is JJ Abrams is an alien.

"maximum transparency " -> invisible UFOs... you can see right through them!

"Fidelity hiring 5000 juniors to replace their 1000 seniors .. hmm.. frankly that's not going to work."

If they expect to replace the seniors today, yes that's not going to work.

If they are looking to have replacements for seniors in 20 years, that's about half of what they will eventually need.

Even if you are downsizing, you have to keep hiring juniors so that all levels of the career ladder are populated.

"you can disable this via flags or GPO "

Until they turn it back on.

If you're going to sell a thing and use the proceeds for a different thing, a public benefit company owned by a non-profit company that invests in the PBC is a pretty normal structure.

If engineers didn't automatically dismiss business administration as a trivial pursuit, their MBAs could gave gotten them to the final structure a lot sooner.

The structure of OpenAI isn't the problem here; it's bad corporate governance.

You can't just add DIMS slots to a memory channel, you have to add more channels.

You can't just add more channels if your memory controller is on the CPU, you have to change the CPU.

At this point, you're no longer selling the same motherboard.

-1, uninsightful

The actual damages *per instance* are low. There's no way that individual action could happen.

The *total* damages are large. It's a market failure to allow them to go unpunished.

This is a rational method of reconciling these two conditions.

I always find it weird that people will call any random game a roguelike and expect you to accept their pronouncement on faith but they'll fight over nethack.

"Spend $12B to get $10B"

-1, compares rate to quantity

"Good luck arguing with the AI customer support agent "

As good as your luck would be arguing with the human customer support agent previously.

"his parents have money"

His parent had Stanford professor money, not MyPillow money.

"When someone asks for H1B's"

-1, offtopic

These are not people applying for H1Bs. These are experienced workers applying for permanent residency.

There's no reasonable way a legislator could be sufficiently divested so that their legislative actions cannot affect their holdings... even if reduced to mattresses stuffed with cash. It would be a rule ripe for selective enforcement.