Wnat do you mean so much bigger? It is lighter and thinner than an airtag, not quite as wide but 14mm longer. If it is too big then so is an airtag

We saw this with google glassholes, why would Meta expect anything else. wearing these in public is just inviting confrontations and by the sounds of things deservedly so.

Sticking your head in the sand and hoping they really only found 5 real bugs is dogshit insanity. It encourages researchers to horde or look for other revenue streams for those bugs which is exactly what you don't want to happen.

Tesla FSD is currently better, but it plateaued long ago and still has constant troubles with the limitations impossed by cameras.

yes but low quality ones certainly could. The way to fix this is work out how to review and disgard to fabricated, not stick your head in the sand and hope that none of them were real.

You can't tell what is chaff till someone or something reviews it. even something that appears as simnple as a display bug may have serious security or corruption implications under the covers.

well sorry for the aggression but it pisses me off when people let vendor shirk their responsibilities because it is "too hard" or "too much work", Apple makes literally 3/4 of a billion dollars a DAY in profit, they can deal with the workload through better AI and handling on their part or more investment in security personnel.

why the fuck should the responsibility fall on the bug reporter. It either is a bug or not, the security implications and classification are for the developers to determine, yes a security researcher may wish to point out the security implications or demonstrate but really it is NOT their responsibility to do so, it is Apples to correctly review and classify the bug.

I have never seen anyone, democrat of otherwise defending Pelosi doing this shit. However, pieces of shit constantly defend Trump doing it and use whataboutism like you to claim it is ok because someone else did it first.

doesn't matter, even random garbage from the president is bankable and tradeable. you can make millions betting on what words he will say next.

Apple Engineer : we are getting too many bugs reported from people due to their use of AI.
Apple Exec : Easy fix let's only let them submit 5 a month.
Apple Engineer : errrr yeah sure that will fix it. rolling eyes sarcasticly.

6 months later
Apple Exec : Why the FUCK are all these bugs being released on the internet for our OS
Apple Engineer : Because you told us to not let people submit them to us....

exactly it is a powerful tool that can save lives, all it needs is proper oversight and auditing. With that in place even most bad actors would not attempt dodgy shit as knowing someone is checking on you is a powerful incentive to do the right thing. I hate the idea of being monitored, but if used appropriately it is definitely a positive, just you cannot trust the people actually using it to also be the oversight.

why would you give them the role of auditing and controlling this? To do it right you give it to a central authority that doesn't have local politics at play that can review every search and the associated proof required to justify it while giving that authority no ability to do searches themselves.

The problem is there is ZERO reason to accept any of this behaviour when it could be so easily audited and controlled if done right. Obviously flock are a bunch of incompetent arseholes that only care about money. The consequence should be serious regulation to come down on their heads like a ton of bricks

They absolutely do find complex bugs. Yes they find more simple ones but they are actually even better at some of the more esoteric unusual bugs.