Comment Re:And the constant delivery scam continues (Score 1) 23
Comment Re:DcukDuckGo might be good for privacy... (Score 4, Informative) 43
Comment Re: CTRL-C (Score 5, Informative) 81
Not enough people seem to know of
Close, but not exactly the same.
Comment Re:Swiftkey (Score 1) 95
Comment Re:Thunderbird (Score 1) 228
Thunderbird is the most lightweight email client that I can see.
I moved from TB to mutt/neomutt a couple of years ago and never looked back. It took a little while to set up, but the migration was definitely worth it. TB is extremely bloated in comparison.
Comment Permanent staff position? (Score 0) 152
I have no doubt it's dire, but it's a bit of misleading statistic. Most academic positions are relatively short-term contracts, often 2-3 years.
Comment Re:Makes Mice Crazy (Score 1) 209
Comment Re:Plug the digital hole. (Score 1) 346
Comment Re:Win XP still gets updates ... (Score 1) 232
Comment Re:Cheating and Trust (Score 1) 174
Comment Re:False positives (Score 1) 102
I would rather see patients come into the hospital because of a false positive rather than sit around with nothing and "hope" nothing's wrong.
If they can't quantify the false positive rate, then it's potentially useless. It's like saying having blood is an indicator of stroke risk. 100% of strokes are caused by having blood. However, if you don't report the false positive rate, it's meaningless. Just because you have blood (or an abnormal heart rhythm) doesn't mean you have an increased chance of strokes.
Comment False positives (Score 3, Insightful) 102
But what about the opposite? How frequently does an abnormal heart rhythm result in a stroke? TFA doesn't mention it.
If this is a low proportion, then there will be many false positives, making detection of abnormal heart rhythm useless in terms of stroke prediction. It will only serve in increase anxiety of users.