Comment Re:What if it filters certain visible frequencies (Score 1) 70
Or Barbra Streisand's 1969 acceptance speech.
Or Barbra Streisand's 1969 acceptance speech.
The DOE signs off on it, (not 100% sure if he does) Trump signs off on it, and the construction company from Home Improvement starts building the thing. Trump has nothing to do with who the NRC chooses to build the thing.
And who controls the DOE? It is not an independent organization. Are you aware of the Washing Memorial Reflecting pool disaster happening right now? No bid $17M contract was given to a Trump loyalist with no experience. The money was spent and now the pool looks worse than before.
Here's something to think about... when Trump isn't in office anymore, who're you going to hate on and blame for everything all the time?
Here's a thought experiment: Will you go to any lengths to excuse Trump of things we know he did?
Sadly I'm sure the same massive building campaigns will happen with reactors. This will also suck for rural people who don't want these reactors in their community. I guess the saving grace is that nuclear sites don't have the massive noise pollution that data centers do.
It will suck more if these are poorly built. Given how Trump normally does things, I am confident that no bid construction contracts will be awarded to loyal campaign contributors who had no experience with construction. After billions are spent, these reactors are found to be so dismally constructed that they must be torn down and rebuilt.
I didn't even realize the newer digital cinema cameras added microphones. But it makes sense even if the quality is terrible for the reason you said.
Every digital cinema camera I've ever heard of has XLR inputs. So if you don't mind being tethered to the boom operator, you don't necessarily even need a field recorder. It all depends on what you're shooting and where and how.
But yeah, decent mics are cheap enough now that even low-end DSLRs have at least survivable mono audio.
canvassing turns any vote into a popularity contest, I don't think that's how it should work
Not necessarily. Canvassing can also bring broader attention to something. For example, I'm hearing about this, and my politics don't align with his, but now I'm curious what the issue is about, and might actually pay attention to it.
Dude... really? That's exactly what you were trying to do with your followers before you were caught red-handed.
At some point, it stops being a mob and starts being a vote. And while it makes sense to not allow people to drag random folks onto the platform just to vote your way, it doesn't make sense to limit voting on an important issue to the 0.1% of users who pay close enough attention to notice. So I can see both sides on this one.
Maybe the right thing to do is to require a certain level of activity to earn the right to vote, then dump the canvassing rules. That way, any canvassing would only serve to increase turnout, rather than truly padding the ballot box.
If you can't see the hateful woke's virtue signalling, it's because you are one of them.
So I take it you will not explain anything you mean. We are supposed to read your mind about your grievances then.
Wikipedia says it's also known as the "Roman Space Telescope". Is that better?
Only if it wears a toga.
Producing hardware when you already have a monopoly on software distribution is a a monopolist d-move.
[sarcasm]Yes because Steam 100% controls all the software that they sell. No one else sells this software at all like GOG, Epic, Microsoft, every publisher themselves, etc. Also no one makes PC hardware that plays games. No one at all.[/sarcasm]
$300 more for 1TB more SSD?
It's $300 for 1.5TB more. Without part numbers we can't really tell it that is slightly more than component cost or not. A Gen4 or Gen5 NVMe SSD is around $300 though. Also performance and reliability is better if the SSD has a small RAM cache which adds to the cost.
"Being against torture ought to be sort of a multipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer, as amended by Jeff Daiell, a Libertarian