Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Access (Score 4, Interesting) 102

"A good deal of that shrinkage was up, not down." A bullshit lie.

The game the rightwingnutjobs and their patrons employ is to set an extremely low bar for measuring the well being of the bottom tier. Despite real per capital GDP increasing 2.5 fold since 1975, and doubling since 1985, the real income of the lowest decile has barely budged. But since it hasn't actually decreased the plutocrat apologists assert there is no problem at all, since according to this one metric "nobody is getting poorer".

A related game is to portray the poor as actually not being poor at all since they "have stuff" - like a TV and a microwave, as it those were still luxury items like they were 60 years ago.

Comment Re:An interesting problem. (Score 1) 76

The part about smoothies (and fruit juices) vs whole vegetables ( and some of the arguments about finely ground foods in general) are about glycemic index. i.e. how quickly the sugars in it hit your bloodstream.

There is a big problem with using the glycemic index as a tool for diet planning. It is a thing, it can be measured, but is it really a relevant thing in the diet for the large majority of people? The rush to found diet plans on the glycemic index was based on assumptions about what effect it probably has on people, not on actual evidence by studying people and their diets. A large meta-analysis of studies found:

The strongest intervention studies typically find little relationship among GI/GR and physiological measures of disease risk. Even for observational studies, the relationship between GI/GR and disease outcomes is limited. Thus, it is unlikely that the GI of a food or diet is linked to disease risk or health outcomes. Other measures of dietary quality, such as fiber or whole grains may be more likely to predict health outcomes. Interest in food patterns as predictors of health benefits may be more fruitful for research to inform dietary guidance.

Glycemic index based diet planning is planning based on a 40 year olf hypothesis, not actual evidence of usefulness. The actual evidence is that it means nothing for most people's health. But hey! is a single number to judge food so "easy"!

Comment Re:Saved? (Score 1) 88

I speed it up, turn off the sound, and turn on closed captioning (CC). Turns YouTube into a speed reading machine.

Well, a reading machine anyway. Even at 2X, the usual max, someone talking is still slower than my reading. 4X might turn the trick and at least catch-up to my actual reading speed.

Slashdot Top Deals

The computer is to the information industry roughly what the central power station is to the electrical industry. -- Peter Drucker

Working...