Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:So does Google actually use any (Score 1) 172

Energy is localized. A solar plant in Texas can't send energy to Ireland. So in places where they physically can, they do. I would expect their Oregon datacenters are 100% hydro. In other places they just can't.

With the construction of HVDC lines, a technology in use since 1930 or so, a solar plant in Texas could send the energy to anywhere in North America (including Mexico, and even Latin America if we wanted to build those lines). Localized to the American super-continent, with a billion person market (or merely the 580 million in North America)? I can live with that. Not all that "localized".

Comment Re: Thanks, Trump! (Score 1) 172

HVDC lines can however connect the east and west coasts (and Canada and the U.S.), making a continent-wide electricity supply system (and market). Coast to coast losses are quite small (a few percent). Being able to balance production and demand across all of North America makes the need for storage and peaking a minor issue.

No single technology provides a complete solution to every problem, anywhere, ever. So criticizing HVDC for what it does not do, but does not need to do, is irrelevant.

Comment Re:Perambulations and Commutations (Score 1) 472

Maybe you can get the FBI director to break the law again violating the Hatch Act, and have FBI agent operatives violating their oaths leaking information to influence the election again. Trump desperately needed that illegal assist.

More people voted for Clinton. Just like Gore. Republicans need corrupt government officials to win. And they say government is the problem. Ingrates!

Comment Gizmodo Is Talking Out of Its Posterior (Score 1) 258

No we do not have to update the number of stars in the Universe, and no they did not "discover the Universe has 20 times as many galaxies as we thought".

This discovery is actually detecting young, numerous galaxies that we believed were there but could not see. In fact, it is simply confirming the accuracy of the existing Lambda-CDM model.

When galaxies first formed there were very numerous small galaxies that merged into fewer more massive galaxies that we can easily see (since they are brighter and closer, being more recent in time). We knew those ancient small galaxies were out there, waiting to be detected. A nice discovery, but no new revelation is involved at all.

Comment There is No Sasquatch - The Evidence is Clear (Score 4, Insightful) 173

Although the catch phrase "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is often repeated, it is fundamentally nonsense - unless elaborately qualified.

If you thoroughly search a room looking for a suspect, and do not find him or her, you know they are not in the space searched. Absence of evidence can obviously be extremely strong evidence of absence if you have effective tools to look for the evidence.

We now have the equivalent situation with respect to "Sasquatch".

With the advent of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring, a technology that has been available now for nearly 20 years, it is possible to survey the animals present in an environment, without ever seeing them, by detecting the traces of DNA they inevitably leave behind. When you consider forensic DNA analysis, analyzing the traces of DNA left on most any object you interact with, the technique is almost 30 years old. No one has ever detected the DNA of an unknown non-human primate in North America.

All of the Sasquatch "evidence" - footprints, disturbed areas, supposed feeding or gathering spots, claimed coprolites, etc. would be loaded with Sasquatch DNA if it was real. Nope, no Sasquatch DNA anywhere. At this point we can close the book on the theory that there is, or has ever been, a Sasquatch.

Comment The Question Is... (Score 1) 250

At what point do you suppose that that crazy, crazy idea of offering better value for the dollar, and a better pricing model, to actually compete for customers will dawn on these industry geniuses? Telling customers who are dropping your service "Your stupid. You aren't saving money but don't know it" when the customer can plainly see that they are saving money is not likely to ever help your business.

What we see though is the universal behavior of business accustomed to monopoly power, and to extracting profit though rents (no not the apartment kind). They abuse power to soak their customers, who then seek any relief available.* And the reaction to that is... never to cut back on the abuse, it is always something else - getting more monopoly supporting laws passed, whining at the customer, plain old denial of reality, etc.

*Unfortunately changing the laws is not a relief available to the individual, and it is extremely difficult to overcome industry influence on lawmakers for collective relief.

Comment Missing the Key Part To Make Sense (Score 1) 75

The summary should have included the next paragraph of the article to make any sense:

And yet, like Newcomen, their innovations are so much more useful to the people who actually have copious amounts of raw material to work from. And so Magic Pony is acquired by Twitter, SwiftKey is acquired by Microsoft – and Lawrence himself gets hired by Amazon from the University of Sheffield, where he was based until three weeks ago.

Or else the poster should have just written a terse summary and not just cut and paste paragraphs. Yeah I know, this is slash-dot...

Comment The Music Industry Has Always Complained... (Score 4, Insightful) 125

About is profits, and about the latest music distribution technology - this goes back to the days when the music industry made money by selling sheet music, and faced the threat of wax cylinders, player piano rolls, then radio play, etc.

Back in the 1990s, when profits were at a (then) all time high, due to people replacing their LP and cassette collections with CDs, the industry was complaining about piracy and got a tax on blank CDs imposed, a straight up subsidy for a highly profitable industry based on zero evidence.

There has never been a new music distribution technology that was not claimed to be a threat to the industry's profits. Another eternal verity - every profit peak is taken to be the "natural" profit level that only despicable piracy could be responsible for eroding.

Actually it is worse than that. The growth rate ramping up to the peak is claimed to be the "natural" state of the industry and year-after-year perpetual profit growth is "normal" and any reduction is due to those nefarious pirates. (And now direct music sales! The horror! Musicians selling music direct to fans! This must not be allowed to grow!)

But an industry whose revenue is due entirely to controlling access to the creativity of other people is like that.

Comment Re:Nope (Score 3, Interesting) 284

Googling "Sault's Law" turns up no obvious references to this "law". This actually sounds a lot like Creationist propaganda, which frequently claims that evolution cannot create greater complexity, when in fact evolution - including artificial genetic algorithms - have no problem doing this.

Comment Re:Look harder (Score 2) 213

In that case, doesn't the CMB radiation represent a frame of reference, kind of like the (discredited) Ether idea?

Yes, it is called the Hubble flow comoving frame. Since we are moving relative to the comoving frame this creates a dipole pattern on the Cosmic Microwave Background due to Doppler shift. For the Solar System (moving within the Milky Way galaxy) it is 369 km/sec in the direction of the boundary between the constellations Leo and Crater.

Slashdot Top Deals

Coding is easy; All you do is sit staring at a terminal until the drops of blood form on your forehead.

Working...