Unfortunately, my brain has a fairly strict rate limiter and I have yet to see a way to pay out of that.

No, if it merely causes disruption and doesn't kill or injure non-combatants, it isn't terrorism.

I was one of those who always looked much younger than my actual age. Then, when I was 53, my left internal carotid artery unraveled. Right out of the blue. Besides the obvious plumbing issue, there was collateral damage to the wiring, and there are neurological issues as well. I have no stamina (chronic fatigue), my eyes are all fracked up, and I have serious vertigo problems - like just falling down at random times. I call it 'tumbling the gyros'. Lord knows how many micro-strokes I had before it smoothly scarred over, as I'm told it has done.

If you, as I did at the time, wonder how I survived losing a carotid artery, search on 'Circle of Willis'. Talk about incredible 'design'! Collateral flow - it's why I'm alive.

But my whole life changed. No real Plan B. Couldn't work, for a start. And my plans for my land here just stopped. I just turned 70, and I look it. I feel 80.

Interesting, thanks. When you include the mass of the battery, what is the power density range?

I'm surprised that motors small enough to hide provide enough power to make a difference. Has anyone studied the physics of this, how much assistance such small motors provide?

Darn /. didnt reproduce the sanskrit. Here's a link: https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita...

Oppenheimer is is said to have quoted from the Bhagavad Gita (11:32): "I have become death, the destroyer of worlds.

Technologies like OAUTH 2.0 have been around for a long, long time, and their purpose is to provide a verifiable audit-trail for users.

And it works! Although there have been (and will always be) security issues, the reality is that technologies like SAML and OAUTH do provide a very useful level of trust.

Except that, although these technologies do allow for a useful transfer of identity, the agents widely used to provide this identity (the IDP) is never an entity that provides a uniformly useful level of identity.

Here I am: Bill Jones (not my real name) citizen of the UK (not my real country, either) and I have no way to properly assert that to, say, Bank of the West (not my real bank, either) or Northern Airlines. (not my real airline)

If I have to assert my true identity, I have a state-issued driver's license or passport. Why do I have no way to assert either of these identification documents electronically?

Why can't I use my passport ID to assert myself to the bank, or the airline?

Seems to me that it would be HIGHLY USEFUL if I could. And it seems to be self-evident and proper that the agencies that issue drivers licenses or passports could offer electronic identification, even if it's sourced out to a tech company with a good reputation.

In the US, it's now become increasingly common to have a unified electronic ID to interact with agencies: see id.me. This is a start, and I know government agencies work GLACIALLY SLOWLY so maybe by the time my grandkids are having babies this could be a thing.

Eh?

> At some point you have to ask why you're using RAID at all. If it's for always-on, avoiding data loss due to hardware failures, and speed, then RAID 6 isn't really am great solution for avoiding data loss when disks get to these kinds of sizes, the chances of getting more than one disk fail simultaneously is approaching one, and obviously it was never great for speed.

If you're at this point, then using drives at all is probably already off the table. But I think this position is probably ridiculous.

I have many years of experience managing file clusters in scopes ranging from SOHO to serving up to 15,000 people at a time in a single cluster. In a cluster of 24 drives under these constant, enterprise-level loads, I saw maybe 1 drive fail in a year.

I've heard this trope about "failure rate approaching 1" since 500GB drives were new. From my own experience, it wasn't really true then, any more than it's true now.

Yes, HDDs have failure rates to keep in mind, but outside the occasional "bad batch", they are still shockingly reliable. Failure rates per unit haven't changed much, even though with rising capacities, that makes the failure rate per GB rise. It still doesn't matter as much as you think.

You can have a great time if you follow a few rules, in my experience:

1) Engineer your system so that any drive cluster going truly offline is survivable. AKA "DR" or "Disaster Recovery". What happens if your data center gets flooded or burns to the ground? And once you have solid DR plans, TRUMPET THE HECK OUT OF IT and tell all your customers. Let them know that they really are safe! It can be a HUGE selling point.

2) Engineer your system so that likely failures are casually survivable. For me, this was ZFS/RAIDZ2, with 6 or 8 drive vdevs, on "white box" 24 bay SuperMicro servers with redundant power.

3) If 24x7x36* uptime is really critical, have 3 levels of redundancy, so even in a failure condition, you fail to a redundant state. For me engineering at "enterprise" level, we used application-layer logic so there were always at least 2 independent drive clusters containing full copies of all data. We had 3 drive clusters using different filesystem technologies (ZFS, XFS/LVM) and sometimes we chose to take one offline to do filesystem level processing or analysis.

4) Backups: You *do* have backups, and you do adhere to the 3-2-1 rule, right? In our case, we used ZFS replication and merged backups and DR. This combined with automated monitoring ensured that we were ready for emergencies, which did happen and were always managed in a satisfactory way.

It doesn't totally rule out jihad, but neither pilot has a Muslim name. Of course it might be a murder-suicide for some other reason.

Tom's basically suggests that Brave is steering requests to one Ponzi scheme to a different Ponzi scheme site that pays them a share of the take. No honor among thieves.

I would think that automated lookup of citations would be easy to implement.Surely virtually all lawyers have access to the databases, as do the judges. Why isn't for the parties and the judge to run everything through a citation lookup program, which would flag anything that it can't find?

No, the article explicitly says that the RAT does not provide any lift. It provides electrical power for the lights, radios, instruments, and fly-by-wire systems.

The actual Science article says: "Earth’s ozone layer blocks the Sun’s shortest wave UV radiation, called UV-C.", which is correct. UV-C is the band with the shortest wavelength within the ultraviolet band. X-rays and gamma rays are not within the ultraviolet band.

It isn't, but in Japan as in many other cultures the woman is considered to have joined her husband's family and her showing respect for his family is more important than him showing respect for her family.