This marks a pivotal moment in online communities and trust. It's not only a mark of the erosion of trust — it's an evolution in what it means to critically evaluate an argument and its source. Identify verification depends on three key parts:
___
I was far too early on the reddit train and left after the APIs were locked down. I acknowledge that it's a hard problem, but I came to wonder if it's a problem that we need solved. Maybe we just need a lot of smaller communities that take a slightly higher barrier of entry. (I acknowledge the irony of saying this on
I read it yesterday, and the biggest miss is that it makes an unfounded assertion that the human processes and loops can change that quickly. Secondarily, it makes the assertion that the ecosystem can be secured in one year, or that people will just stop caring that they could lose all their money at the drop of a hat. (And somehow crypto will be able to scale in a way it couldn't over the last decade.)
We are still in a ten year process of continually exposing bottlenecks with a large group of bad actors ready to take advantage of any gaps. All it takes is for a deca-millionaire to lose a significant chunk of their money due to an AI mistake for everyone to panic and set everything back.
I'll admit - I don't understand how companies haven't gone cat and mouse with this. For example, if a company wants to create a speculative product, couldn't they just fund a "contracting company" that hires people? If the bet is successful, the parent company buys out the "contracting company" - otherwise, they stop paying the other company and it just goes bankrupt.
I think it's basically "tactical insolvency."
Ads make sense for $20/mo services that might be able to make $10 in ad revenue and can sell the service for $12/mo if you choose ad supported.
But AI companies are currently burning $10 for every $1 in revenue. At some point those $60 services need to become $600/mo and the $200 services need to convince you to pay $2,000/mo. Something thatâ(TM)s likely doable when they actually can replace half a $15,000/mo developer.
But when youâ(TM)re paying $2,000/mo for the service, whoâ(TM)s going to tolerate a $1,992/mo service that spams you with ads?
Itâ(TM)s the same reason Jeep may desperately sell in dash ads but Rolls Royce and Bentley know it would tank their sales far more than any revenue theyâ(TM)d gain.
Put your best foot forward. Or just call in and say you're sick.