Comment Loss of privacy is a punishment (Score 1) 51
Of course we should worry about the slippery slope here. But as long as this is viewed and used as a punishment, I think it is excellent use of digital surveillance. If you commit a crime, you lose some privacy as you are put under extensive surveillance which also detters from committing more crimes.
When looking at violent crimes (in Sweden), 1% of the population committed nearly 2/3rds of all violent crimes. I would be happy to put that 1% in a digital police state to protect the more lawâabiding 99%.
Starting with criminal immigrants makes some sense. When the system is up and running, it should be expanded to include everyone convinced of serious crimes or repeat offenders. If you - for example â gets three years of digital surveillance for a car burglary, there is a good chance that you won't commit any more burglaries. So it will probably prevent lots of crime.