Comment Re:This rhetorical question seems easy to answer (Score 1) 153
I think you just described humans. WE are the danger to this world, and provide no value to it
I think you just described humans. WE are the danger to this world, and provide no value to it
No one eats viruses but quite a lot of species depend on mosquitoes to survive, or eat the mosquito-eaters to survive.
You don't have to kill any mosquitoes, just replace them with a genetically modified version that is resistant to parasites?
Quite a lot of animals feed on insects, and then some carnivores might feed on them.
If you overfish sardines, anything bigger than a sardine may also suffer a population decline, as it is a staple food for lots of yummy fish and also marine mammals..
Seen Youtube lately? I just watched a video on how to make nitroglycerin. Stuff like this has been available for over a decade.
Back in the days that home solar systems still mostly used lead-acid batteries - which in some cases of degradation could be repaired, at least partially, if you had some good strong and reasonably pure sulfuric acid - I viewed a YouTube video on how to make it. (From epsom salts by electrolysis using a flowerpot and some carbon rods from old large dry cells).
For months afterward YouTube "suggested" I'd be interested in videos from a bunch of Islamic religious leaders . (This while people were wondering how Islamic Terrorists were using the Internet to recruit among high-school out-group nerds.)
Software - AI and otherwise - often creates unintended consequences. B-)
It's kind of surprising it isn't all squealing nonsense.
Give it a little more time. B-b
We had a lab known to be unsafe. A lab known to be performing gain of function on the specific type of virus that emerged in public. We have a lab in close proximity to the market where the outbreak was traced back to.
We also had rumors that low-paid lab techs supplemented their income by selling test animals they'd been ordered to destroy to the nearby wet market.
So current AI training procedures - which amount to "read all the internet you can" - fall for astroturf campaigns. Why am I not surprised?
>It's one of the few segments in IT where you're not directly at constant risk of being replaced by an H1B.
Truth. One of the reasons why I keep gravitating back to defense work. Only since around 2004 or so; there's now this "government shutdown" nonsense, which is a bit of a vicious circle, because programs get fucked over, then you have to roll off the contract and find work on another. And sometimes, there isn't any. (happened to me at Lockheed), so some people have to cycle back into the private sector for a few years (which isn't a bad thing; because THAT is where you pick up new skills, to be honest). Then when some asshole "businessman" crashes the business and does layoffs (to replace you with H1B's), you're back on the street again, and you end up back in the "safe" sector: defense. Oh, and if your Clearance expires while you're in the private sector, then the contractor just pays the $10k (or whatever it is now) to re-do your investigation. This has happened to me twice now.
There's also the "Detox" exercise of leaving your phone at home. and only taking it with you when it's absolutely necessary for example to work if you have to use a third factor authentication application to get into your computer)
Just switch on "airplane mode". No incoming calls, message notifications, or app push crud. (If you've got any apps, other than alarm/calendar notices for your schedule reminders which YOU set up, that poke brain-derailng messages at you, disable (or delete) them.)
Then get into the habit of not going to it for anything non-essential while in this mode.
Now you can use it for a key, or wallet, or whatever, if you must, without it constantly killing your attention span with interruptions. Yet you can always turn it back on to make a call, or in the timeslot you reserved for handling this trivia.
No incoming calls, though. (What a relief: No phone spammers!)
I keep hearing about miracle breakthroughs whenever researchers need money but they never go into production.
Nobody knows what Napster is, try buying Crunchyroll and turn it into a 3D experience.
Why would I need a cryptographic ledger thingamabob, whatever the hell that is, in order to buy and own an image? It's as if people didn't buy and sell images all the time, for instance in stock photos websites. Not that I am terribly fussed over a wallpaper image being used by someone else, legally or otherwise.
When will reality catch up with the cryptobros?
There is one scientist later on in the first part who does say they couldn't rule out someone who may have been infected at the lab visiting the market and starting the ball rolling, but they also say there is no evidence to back this up. Considering the number of people who ride that line each day, if there was a sick person from the lab spreading their infection, there should have been far more people getting sick all over the place. That didn't happen. The earliest known infections were all clustered around the market.
It doesn't have to have been an infected human. An infected experimental animal - or a pest animal that had come into contact with lab animals or materials - could have been an initial vector.
For some time stories have circulated that low-paid lab techies at the Wuhan lab had been known to supplement their income by taking experimental animals they had been ordered to kill and dispose of safely and instead sell them at the wet market.
is it just me, or does that sound like a sexy place?
I hear chines live-food-animal markets are called that because they typically sell seafood (fish, lobsters, etc.) which are kept alive in big water tanks.
Ask them to generate text with ChatGPT and analyze each assertion, explaining why it's right or wrong based on the officially recommended reading material, with citations and accurate page numbers etc.
Use your own book or another one that is not entirely mainstream so GPT won't have heard of it.
Grade them on how well researched something is and on the quality of their critical thinking and argumentative skills. GPT will not usually give you multiple citations for the same thing.
Memorization is for USB pens, not people.
I use AI to generate code in my day to day job (I'm tacitly expected to use Copilot in order to be productive, that's why they're paying for it)
panic: kernel trap (ignored)