Comment Re:Haha "This could have serious consequences" wow (Score 3, Informative) 97
Comment Re:Ah, Iridium (Score 1) 77
Comment Re:Obi, anyone? (Score 1) 178
Comment Re:It's their own fault. (Score 1) 443
Comment Re:Honestly... (Score 1) 282
Comment Re:Honestly... (Score 1) 282
Comment Re:Turkish Delight (Remember Narnia!) (Score 1) 152
I'm not sure blaming Steam because your ISP wants to limit your connection is completely accurate, however.
Comment Re:Turkish Delight (Remember Narnia!) (Score 1) 152
Comment Re:Turkish Delight (Remember Narnia!) (Score 1) 152
Comment Re:Words (Score 1) 255
Comment Re:Wrong place (Score 1) 457
Perhaps I, and others, equate incandescent with "natural" light because the brightness is at least closer to sunlight than the weak output of either CFLs or LEDs. I've used both alternatives at various points in their technological evolution, and I remain unimpressed with the results.
I use a single CFL bulb in my home - in the garage. It's remained lit for going on 3 years now, and it serves that function well. Garages aren't meant to be visually pleasing; I don't read there, for example. But in places where I do read, sunlight or incandescents are my only viable option.
You say incandescents aren't cheaper - but they are. I can buy a 24 pack of type A's for the price of two or three CFLs, and maybe half a decent LED fixture. I've found the difference in electricity costs is minimal.
From a technological standpoint, I'd love to advance my lighting needs past burning metal filaments, but aesthetically, I just can't.
Comment Re:Wrong place (Score 1) 457
Comment Re:Why Walmart and not WholeFoods or Trader Joes? (Score 1) 229
I'm the same as you on the "don't talk to me, just tell me how much I owe and let's move on" camp. I think it's wonderful that some people feel the need to form deep personal bonds with their cashier - I am not among that population.