Comment Re:I've noticed that too (Score 1) 56
I noticed this in Claude (from DDG). It invariably tries to shorten sentences or make them more compact and concise. Sometimes that can be good, but most times long-winded sentences are what are needed.
Would like to add one tidbit because I've had this same conversation at work. The professor stated they used AI to help edit only after hundred of hours of writing. In other words, they did the heavy lifting and only used AI at the end to help refine what they had already done.
Is this any different than a human editor? If I write a book, do what I can to edit it down, then go to an editor who makes suggests, removes or reorders parts, and so on, is that any different than having AI do the same thing? In both cases you wrote the words. In both cases you went somewhere else to help edit.
If people claim that using AI to edit a work is "cheating" because it's no longer your work, then the same should apply to a human editor.
Is there doubt?
Re-enlist and we can swap your life force for [whatever these fucks are actually trying to achieve over there with ItsNotReali monsters]
Jesus Fucking Christ. It's 2026, Trump has been putting his boot on the necks of major networks and studios for a year and a half now. I realize you probably fell into a coma in 2016, but ten years later, the free press, regardless of what you think of it, or fair you imagine it is, is under direct assault. Fuck off with the "MSM" bullshit and grow the fuck up.
Instead of rare books, let us rare video games or computers. Let's say someone bought a rare version of a Ninentendo system (an early edition) and said, "You know what, I'm going to see what happens if I apply a larger and larger force to it. Let's see how long it stays intact."
Mind you, they did a 3-D scan of the system so you can digitally see it, but the physical copy no longer exists.
How many of you would raise a stink at destroying it?
If not Nintendo, pick something you like and go back to its earlier days where something is rare and someone wants to destroy it, just because.
One of the things people complain about the digital age is loss of information. Sure, these books "exist" in a digital form today, but what about in 50 years?
This is why physical books are still superior to digital. We can still read books/scrolls/clay tablets from centuries ago. It is doubtful the same will be said for digital books.
For me the visualization of direct collapse black hole formation is that there's still a huge mass of gas falling in, at the boundary of the new black hole nearly dense enough to direct collapse itself. The blowback would compress the inflow over the density edge and you get a whole cloud of black holes.
It's pretty cool that they're seeing where the supermassive black holes come from. The models of what's happening in there must be amazing.
He's actually Vulcan (without the logic).
They could grow some spines and implant them into the UK government members then the UK could stop supporting the genocidal entity.
[obligatory]
vim will do.
BYTE editors are people who separate the wheat from the chaff, and then carefully print the chaff.