They became trash a few years back. Have never regretted dropping them.

I fully agree. Violate KISS and things will never get to a secure or reliable state. The "web framework" crowd does not seem to know that basic fact.

Just a demo that shows React is crap. Like most "web frameworks" really. Almost all are gross KISS violations and that cannot go well.

The greedy scum will make sure everything goes down.

Wow, arrogant _and_ clueless. Nice!

Indeed. RC4 never got the maturity that anybody competent would have used is. But MS never did "competent".

Yep. MS is decades late and was essentially forced to do this.

Why are they still in business, again? And how are regular developers expected to get it right, when they see messed-up stuff like this made by a major player?

Indeed. So not happening. But make being sick more expensive is also in the works.

Good for profits though. Unfettered capitalism at work.

Found the idiot.

Indeed. These people are malicious and of negative worth to society.

They are hallucinating and not rational.

Maybe. Depends entirely on its characteristics. If it is essentially an average human, it is simply worthless as a technology because we know how to make a lot of those and they are not really good at anything. But it does not really look like AGI is possible. On the other hand, it looks increasingly like average people do not use (or maybe do not have) General Intelligence to any degree that matters, hence that "average human" may be within reach eventually, even it that is then not AGI. Not anytime soon though.

You do understand that the Turing "Test" is actually a joke made by Alan Turing, right? It is not a scientifically valid test.

Yep. This is, I think, my 3rd AI hype. Always the same bullshit promises. Never any real delivery, because they do not have what they claim to have.

Choice idiotic quote: "When computers have more transistors than human brains have neurons, they will be smarter than humans" (paraphrased, Marvin "the idiot" Minsky). That is the "intelligence critical mass" theory, which is complete baseless nonsense and wishful thinking, without even a shred of scientifically sound evidence supporting it.

Incidentally, smart people have known all along that it is not a question of data or computing resources. Actually competent AI researchers (apparently a minority in that field) have been saying all along that something critical is missing. And we have no idea what that is and whether it even can be done in machines.