Comment Re: You don't replace the king (Score 1) 83
The wealthy want to have everything and pretend the poor won't come looking for food. It's not clear why they want to pretend it won't happen again when it always happens
The wealthy want to have everything and pretend the poor won't come looking for food. It's not clear why they want to pretend it won't happen again when it always happens
Hardware and/or LLM as a service fees.
Two thirds of the voters are that dumb, as the ones who didn't vote are also idiots. The only message you send by not voting is that you will roll over.
Put stereo controls on the steering wheel, even cheap cars often offer this as an option now anyway. Put physical climate controls below the screen. You might need to look to grab the knob, but you can look at the road while you turn it. With some of these screen-only climate control systems they have sliders or other stupid controls that require a lot of attention. And also a button to activate the camera since every vehicle has poor rear visibility now.
"Europe" didn't invent the World Wide Web. Tim Berners-Lee invented the basic principles and the CERN's page was the first one, but "Europe" (I imagine you refer to the european union) never capitalized on it
The WWW is older than the EU, though the general public became aware of it in the same year the Maastricht Treaty was signed. The principle of hypertext is older than the WWW, though. I had hypertext software on DOS, it "only" didn't link to other computers. That's an obvious extension, though. And it literally is obvious, because people were doing similar things with Unix, via rcp and uucp. For example, there were automated UUCP info gateways. You'd send them mail and they'd send you dynamic data.
Thanks for defending president Trump against Musk.
In what way is pointing out that Musk is a Nazi a defense of a POTUS who is also a Nazi?
" In some cases, the AI model will generate further copies by how it responds to prompts, "
In no cases, you mean. It creates some close variants which might be considered derivative works, though.
Evaporative cooling. The water is lost to the atmosphere. The total power budget for your query includes a percentage of the energy it took to train the model. Just serving your query isn't all that expensive, but the training time is.
For me, the game I cannot play is Rust. Yes you can run it just fine, and yes there are maybe a couple of servers you can play on, and they have anticheat disabled. There are popular anticheat systems which work on Linux, EAC being one of them, and I've got a lot of games with online components and anticheat which do work very well. I was surprised by the percentage of my various game libraries* which could be easily installed via Lutris and work just fine. Most of them have very good performance as well.
A handful of Steam games don't run and more don't run well without Proton-GE, but a lot of games work without any addons at all. And speaking of addons, they are mostly easy to manage using steamtinkerlaunch, which supports both Vortex and MO2. There are definitely game mods which don't work well with Wine or Proton, mostly ones which have very specific runtime requirements. Some of those don't run well even with the runtimes installed with wine/protontricks.
* For a while there, Humble Bundles were awesome, and a lot of those games were on services which I never would have otherwise patronized.
There are different ways to validate an LLM and
...all of them which don't involve human effort are bullshit, because only humans can suitably detect the hallucinations.
Your calculator is executing a simple and provable algorithm, the LLM is executing a complex and non-provable one because the inputs are too varied. They are fundamentally different things. Your calculator is limited, but predictable and thus reliable.
Could the model not be trained to be nearly deterministic in it's outputs?
No. The technology doesn't do that. Instead of whatever ineffable process we use to correlate things in ways that make sense, it only and solely correlates things in ways which look like they make sense. You cannot train your way out of this problem, an entirely new technology is needed. Maybe to replace this, maybe only to augment it, but still fundamentally different.
Now?
Idevices have always been limited compared to their competition, deliberately so.
Yes, now is part of always. Why is this even part of the discussion?
However they're starting to need that artificial limitation more than ever as they kill OSX without wanting to kill the cash cow that is the Mac user, so your IDevice will be deliberately hobbled so they can sell you a slightly less hobbled Mac labelled IDevice for more money than it's worth.
Starting to? This is how it's always worked.
Are you stuck in a time loop or something? That might explain your confusion over these words...
We've gotten very wrapped up in the philosophical discussion of whether AI models are "thinking." But most people don't actually care whether we've reached some abstract achievement of creating "thought." Most people just care if the tool can do the job.
The tool can't do the job because it's not thinking, which is why people keep bringing that up. Think about it before complaining!
"Ahead warp factor 1" - Captain Kirk