It's just not something people want.
I don't think that this is true at all. It's just not something people want to pay used car money for. I'd love to have something like it (though I'd rather have a cable than have the battery pack on my head, what a shit idea that is) but I'm not fucking rich.
It's good billionaires are going to have something to spit on us from. I'd hate for them to have to use lung power to do it because they're in a mere limousine.
Sony has digital exclusives you cannot buy on physical media. But more importantly, a "Seller" of a "Product" (THEY are the ones calling it a sale) should not be able to fuck you out of it like this later. They should have to make clear that it is a rental at every step, but that would reduce sales. (If it wouldn't, they wouldn't not be doing that.)
Physical media is PERFECT for users that, dare I say it, LACK INTERNET ACCESS and can't download digital copies of games...
There are two kinds of users without internet access, those who never had it, and those who had it and lost it.
There are also two kinds of idiots...
While this is completely true, we still should want this principle to win even if Leon is a hypocrite whose actions have helped to kill tens of thousands of people and we would like to see him test pilot a leaky rocket.
If we can get our government back then we can use the same principle against him in the future if necessary. If we can't, then we've got bigger problems.
NOTE- the schools should provide free daycare services after school.
Then the government should fund it.
For many children, this would be safer and better than being at home!
OK, but how much of that is due to the deliberate dumbing down of the populace by the Republicans since the Reagan era, which we can only combat with more education? Instead of free day care, we should spend the money making school longer, and instead of cramming it with more shit, give more time for personalized instruction and alternate learning methods.
There's not one right way for students to learn, because different people learn best in different ways. The idea that all students will benefit most from trying to learn from books at home is a ridiculous one at best.
Students can read the assignments or learn at their own pace using whatever methods they find suits them, and then can demonstrate their understanding and practice their new knowledge under supervision of a teacher
After they practiced doing it wrong for an hour at home as their first exposure to the idea? Great plan with no drawbacks!
school districts are often tied financially to this model, where butts in seats equals money
School districts are tied a model where the executives and consultants can make more than the teachers. It's a travesty and it needs to stop.
The teachers hate it.
The teachers hate it because they're getting fucked over bigly.
The kids hate it.
The kids hate it because it's shit. If only we allocated funding correctly and didn't fuck over teachers (these things are related) then perhaps they could have decent schooling.
Some parents probably like it because "I need my kids in school so I can work my full 8 hours" but is that smart? No. It's not. None of it is.
True. It's really fucking stupid to have everyone working more hours than necessary to do more work than necessary because we have so much waste and duplication of effort built into our society specifically to keep us all too tired and busy to revolt.
You didn't address the comment to which you replied AT ALL. Not even a tiny bit.
Schools should have twice as many teachers and the school day should be one third longer. Good luck finding funding though?
"Since you don't dispute anything he said, you have agreed with it."
You're an even bigger Nazi troll idiot than he is if you think that is how anything works. I owe neither him nor you an argument.
"There's a battle still raging in their mind that we don't fully understand biochemically," FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said.
You never will understand it biochemically because it's not all biochemical, except in the sense that they are physical beings and we can describe the physical changes with chemistry. We cannot identify any biomarkers for most mental illnesses. We treat them chemically anyway, often with drugs with severe side effects. How many of the people whose symptoms we manage in this fashion (if they have to use the drug for the rest of their life, it's not a cure) are just reacting to their environment, which we deliberately keep shitty so that the worst people can bring home dividends from their investments?
I think that is one of the few legitimate uses. Otherwise we will see more and more restaurants that do not allow children.
I like those. It's a great reason to go to a bar for food, especially in sane locations where people aren't allowed to smoke in them. I don't mind kids who can keep to the same social rules as [most of] the rest of us, and I was one of those kids. And it was at least in part because nobody treated me like I was a little prince who should be allowed to be an asshole in a restaurant. Giving kids a tablet when they act like a little shit is training them to be a little shit to get what they want.
cry when you realize Trump and Israel stopped Iran from getting them.
Netanyahu, is that you? Don't you have children to bomb, journalists to snipe, and POWs to rape?
*was but I'm okay with a reunion
The other line moves faster.
