Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - How Our Brutal Science System Almost Cost Us A Pioneer Of mRNA Vaccines

theodp writes: As the first COVID-19 vaccines arrived at Penn Medicine last year, Penn Today reported with great pride, "It was mRNA research conducted at Penn—by Drew Weissman, a professor of Infectious Diseases, and Katalin Karikó, an adjunct associate professor—that helped pave the way for the development of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID vaccines." While Weissman and Karikó are coronavirus vaccine heroes these days, Dr. David Scales — who studied under Weissman and Karikó 20 years ago as they worked on mRNA vaccines aimed to fight HIV — recalls How Our Brutal Science System Almost Cost Us A Pioneer Of mRNA Vaccines.

"When I got my own [COVID vaccine] shot," Scales writes, "I felt an added emotion: awe. You see, I witnessed some of the early scientific heartbreaks that came before the historic vaccine victories. And I found myself simply awestruck by the scientists I knew who persevered in spite of our system of scientific research. [...] While Weissman was an expert at designing experiments, I remember him most for his generosity. He made sure all contributors in the lab shared the credit, from the lab tech and lowly undergrad all the way to fellow researcher Karikó. Still, Karikó was struggling. Her science was fantastic, but she was less adept at the competitive game of science. She tried again and again to win grants, and each time, her applications were rejected. Eventually, in the mid-1990s, she suffered the academic indignity of demotion, meaning she was taken off the academic ladder that leads to becoming a professor. [...] But [Karikó] stuck to her passions. She was too committed to the promise of mRNA to switch to other, perhaps more easily fundable projects. Eventually, the university stopped supporting her."

"Academic science failed Karikó. But when she contacted me in 2015, I saw she had moved to the private sector, a common path for researchers when a university stops offering support. I was glad to see she had landed on her feet. And now, I watch in awe, like the rest of the world, as the technology she helped developed leads to one of the most spectacular victories in the history of science — a vaccine for a deadly pandemic developed in less than one year. So, my vaccination day was an emotional one. As the lipid-encapsulated mRNA molecules went into my arm, I reminisced about Kati and Drew, and the lab circa 2000. And I thought: You were right, Kati. You were right."
Government

The First E-President 169

Szentigrade writes "Popular Science is running a letter by Daniel Engber of the online Slate Magazine in which he offers the US Presidential nominees advice on using the full potential of the Internet upon their election into office. Some examples discussed in the letter include: a project already being developed that speeds up the patent approval process, a UK site that aims to improve government-citizen interactions, and perhaps most importantly, a call for government information to be 'presented in a standardized and widely used data format, like XML, so that anyone — in or out of government — could use and reconfigure it however they pleased.' Will 2009 be the first year of the E-President?"

Comment Is computer science dead? (Score 1) 641

Even though the modern University defines its disciplines by market demand - which can be a slave to fashion. The issue is whether there are any genuine "big questions" left in Computer Science. Much of the early part of CS dealt with the scarcity of computing - how to make use of the limited resources of memory, computation. We don't need this anymore - there is an abundance of computing. I guess I've been fascinated by the dramatic gap between human capabilities of thinking, and the capabilities of computers. Can we ever make computers that even remotely approximate the capabilities of human brains? I don't think we are much closer to answering that question than we were 30 years ago. But in this particular question we have learned that it is of very little commercial value to answer this question. So CS research may remain a discipline with big questions, but with funding comparable to (for example) archeology. But CS skills continue to be in demand, even if CS research is a bit past it. When I was young, I was blessed with teachers who told me things plainly. So: if you are interested in CS, or computers in general, and you turn aside from this path because people tell you it's not commercial, then you are going the wrong way. Follow your interests - tell your parents and your peers to go take a long walk and leave you alone. Fortunately it seems that only students in the Western world suffer from these delusions. Which will just accelerate the movement of the center of IT to China and India.

Slashdot Top Deals

Kiss your keyboard goodbye!

Working...