Let's look at the numbers (US Dollars):
2019 Revenue - $70.7 Billion
2019 Active Users - 2.7 Billion

If every single user stayed and paid an equal subscription price, you'd be on the hook for about $26/year. Of course, some percentage of those accounts are bots and a large number of real users will not stick around if they have to pay. And splitting the collection into ad supported and paid subscriptions won't work at this scale because the more people opt out of ads, the less value the remaining pool has, causing the subscription price to increase, which in turn will drive more users away from the platform. Vicious cycle...
For a sense of how it will play out, look at the struggle for newspapers trying to move online. Those that move to a subscription model see sharp drops in readership as users flee to another platform.
The bottom line is that we like to whine about privacy but in the end, "free" stuff wins.

No word on what they plan to do with the massive amounts of carbon monoxide this will create as a byproduct?

Everyone was just too willing to accept the idea that the existing companies involved in blood testing are crooks (Spoiler alert: they are), that they were all too willing to jump on board with "disruptive" technology that will "change the game" and "beat the system."

Yes, because all police interactions happen slowly enough for backup to arrive before escalating to violence, right?