Submission Summary: 0 pending, 57 declined, 54 accepted (111 total, 48.65% accepted)
In Texas, where Tesla is incorporated, the law requires companies to hold annual meetings no later than 13 months since the previous meeting. In Tesla’s case, that would be Sunday, July 13. Tesla has not announced a date for a meeting or filed any proxy statements — the documents that describe the annual meeting’s agenda, the candidates for the board and proposals to be voted on.
The meeting would normally provide shareholders an opportunity to speak directly to Tesla’s board and to Elon Musk, the chief executive, at a critical time for the company. Tesla sales have been plunging, and the stock price has fallen almost 40 percent from a peak in December.
It is unclear whether there would be any consequence for missing the deadline — Texas law does not stipulate any penalties, and there are few legal precedents. In an extreme scenario, Nasdaq could de-list the company. Large shareholders, such as pensions and mutual fund managers, sent a letter to the board in late May practically begging Musk to devote at least 40 hours a week to focusing on the company.
An annual meeting may hardly matter. In May, the SEC allowed Tesla to omit six of eight proposed shareholder resolutions from its upcoming proxy statement. The board of directors has long been seen as acting at Musk's direction, rather than the other way around, leading to a lawsuit over Musk's enormous pay package. “It’s hard for me to imagine any other board of a major corporation allowing the kind of plummeting stock price and deleterious behavior of a C.E.O. as this board has allowed to happen,” Brooke Lierman, the Maryland comptroller, said in an interview.
In the early 20th century, when Henrietta Leavitt began studying photographs of distant stars at the Harvard College Observatory, astronomers had no idea how big the universe was....Leavitt, working as a poorly paid member of a team of mostly women [computers] who cataloged data for the scientists at the observatory, found a way to peer out into the great unknown and measure it.
Leavitt discovered the period-luminosity relationship for Cepheid variable stars. The relationship, now known as Leavitt's Law, is a crucial rung in the cosmic distance ladder, the methods for measuring the distance to stars, galaxies, and across the visible universe.
[Leavitt's Law] underpinned the research of other pioneering astronomers, including Edwin Hubble and Harlow Shapley, whose work in the years after World War I demolished long-held ideas about our solar system’s place in the cosmos. Leavitt’s Law has been used on the Hubble Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope in making new calculations about the rate of expansion of the universe and the proximity of stars billions of light years from earth.
“She cracked into something that was not only impressive scientifically but shifted an entire paradigm of thinking....”
On Friday, Earth’s haunting silence will come to an end as NASA switches that communications channel back on, restoring humanity’s ability to say hello to its distant explorer.
Because of the direction in which it is flying out of the solar system, Voyager 2 can only receive commands from Earth via one antenna in the entire world. It’s called DSS 43 and it is in Canberra, Australia. It is part of the Deep Space Network, or DSN, which along with stations in California and Spain, is how NASA and allied space agencies stay in touch with the armada of robotic spacecraft exploring everything from the sun’s corona to the regions of the Kuiper belt beyond the orbit of Pluto. (Voyager 2’s twin, Voyager 1, is able to communicate with the other two stations.)
A round-trip communication with Voyager 2 takes about 35 hours — 17 hours and 35 minutes each way....
While Voyager 2 was able to call home on the Canberra site’s smaller dishes during the shutdown, none of them could send commands to the probe....
NASA... did send one test message to the spacecraft at the end of October when the antenna was mostly reassembled.
On June 7, 1954, Alan Turing, a British mathematician who has since been acknowledged as one the most innovative and powerful thinkers of the 20th century — sometimes called the progenitor of modern computing — died as a criminal, having been convicted under Victorian laws as a homosexual and forced to endure chemical castration. Britain didn’t take its first steps toward decriminalizing homosexuality until 1967.
Only in 2009 did the government apologize for his treatment.
"How do I love thee? My accumulator overflows."