Comment In unrelated news... (Score 3, Funny) 366
Comment Re:Democracy is the problem (Score 1) 709
Comment Re:Not a tax scam (Score 1) 1505
And actually, the evil businesses he is targeting are not cheats. They followed the law to the letter. Blame congress for leaving the loop holes.
It is more fundamental than that. A business must make a profit to survive. Think about plain and simple truth for a moment...
Now think about this:
A business never pays any taxes. It merely collects the taxes levied on it by government by increasing the price of the goods and services it provides or by lowering the wages of its employees.
Comment Re:Exactly -- is the software the means, or the en (Score 1) 370
A sucky one though. I doubt many programmers on this board want to be in a position that the work they produce for a company is essentially worthless and the way to move up is through the tech support department. I also doubt customers would benefit either since giving away the software and charging for support creates an incentive to make shoddy software that requires a lot of hand-holding.
That might hold true until your competitor realises what you are doing and makes a better offer to the customer.
As a business customer I want Free as in Freedom software (to avoid vendor lock-in) that is easy to use (to lower total-cost-of-ownership) and comes with "enterprise" level support (for the edge cases I create that eventually break things in some way).
As a vendor I want software that is cheap to build and maintain over the long run, and I want to build brand loyalty (even in a fiercely competitive market) by delivering a great product, and I don't want to have to maintain a huge support staff that eats into the profits I make by selling support contracts. Enterprise customers will pay for support simply because it eliminates some risk, even if they never actually have to pick up the phone and use it.
Comment Re:Biggest disappointment thusfar (Score 5, Insightful) 788
Obama took out of his Presidential campaign to vote in favor of spying on innocent Americans.
What did you expect?
Comment Re:Change we can believe in. (Score 1) 785
Comment There is a solution... (Score 3, Informative) 237
Submission + - MIT hacks XKCD talk with AACS key
Students Embarrass eBay With Firefox Add-On 269
Submission + - New Fair Use Bill introduced today to change DMCA
Submission + - MP3's Loss, Open Source's Gain
Vista Worse For User Efficiency Than XP 546
EU Wants German Telekom Fiber Open to All 100
Submission + - How to Keep America Competitive
This issue has reached a crisis point. Computer science employment is growing by nearly 100,000 jobs annually. But at the same time studies show that there is a dramatic decline in the number of students graduating with computer science degrees. The United States provides 65,000 temporary H-1B visas each year to make up this shortfall — not nearly enough to fill open technical positions. Permanent residency regulations compound this problem. Temporary employees wait five years or longer for a green card. During that time they can't change jobs, which limits their opportunities to contribute to their employer's success and overall economic growth.
Interesting read, but this argument is not new and is based on a distortion of truth. If US companies simply offered fair pay, good benefits, and a general sense of job security to US citizens there would be no reason to insource labor from other countries. Mr. Gates implies that US workers are not willing to work IT anymore. He fails to mention why. Most college students do not wish to throw away 4 years of their lives (and thousands of dollars) on a career in an industry rife with outsourcing. Mr. Gates acknowledges that most US companies are not interested in offering competitive wages, so the only solution in his eyes is to import coders willing to work for a lot less (or, outsource). This has nothing to do with innovation and everything to do with creating downward pressure on IT costs.