can you prove anything was on the phone can you tell me the crime he was accused off all no. the worst hes getting out of this is obstruction the rest will get dropped.
even without Constitution the case dies in two questions. the cops had no idea what they where looking for it was pure fishing. so they cant prove anything was destroyed. then of what crime where they trying to charge him with they also wont have a real answer.
then you get into what where they searching for they wont have a answer and what crime was i being accused off another no answer. this has no chance in court. this will fall silent in a few weeks and you will never hear about it again.
they can try but its going to fall apart before you even get into the Constitution issues. what i mean there gonna say evidence search you reply of what they wont have a answer, they might say a crime and again what crime was i being charged with. the case is dead.
normaly first you get the cam normally the worst one with shady ads and all. then someone take that and cleans it up you acully get a decent picture but crappy audio. then you get the streaming version.
the left do the same they just use the word green as the excuse. they will ram threw mandates on stuff thats not ready or proven noneffective or even more toxic eg ev car batterys. eg solar and wind. you can cover the earth in panels and you would still not meet the power demands relly when you try and shove ev nobody wants into the factor. wind only works in certen areas and only when there is well wind.