Comment We are (Score 1) 25
We're cooked, literally
We're cooked, literally
California's version "adds a certification bureaucracy on top: state-approved algorithms, state-approved software control processes, state-approved printer models, quarterly list updates
This is the most California thing I've ever read. Unconstitutional, unenforceable, and a massive increase in costs and bureaucracy; they hit the trifecta! I wonder if printer manufacturers that bake their own bread will be exempt once their checks to the governor's presidential campaign clear.
Incidentally, this is the kind of stupid shit that helps Trump and people like him get elected over and over.
There's a very clear pattern when we look at who benefits in any given gold rush and while there's a few big winners that fuel the mania, the vast, vast majority are losers.
And then there's Nvidia, happily selling shovels all day.
No, of course not, because he's stuck in his dogmatic viewpoint. He doesn't actually know much about LLMs, but he's got a ton of beliefs about them. And you have a hard time changing peoples' beliefs.
Don't ask some LLM's how many "r"s are in strawberry.
That was definitely a problem two years ago. I did just check in ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini and all reported 3 correctly. The problem with people throwing out these sorts of criticisms isn't that they're all wrong; it's that they're ignorant of the leaps in progress being made. These models are rapidly improving and it's getting harder to find serious gotchas with them. They're still weak in some areas (e.g., spatial reasoning), but for serious power users who know how to prompt them well? They've become insanely powerful tools.
Not gods; tools. But really, really strong tools for huge variety of tasks.
I sold a subreddit to a sex toy manufacturer
I've used ChatGPT to write code and Gemini to debug it. If you pass the feedback back and forth, it takes a couple iterations but they'll eventually agree that it's all good and I find that's about 90-95% of the way to where I need it to be. Earlier today I took a 6kb script that had been used as something fast and dirty for years - written by someone long gone from the company - and completely revamped it into something much more powerful, robust, and polished in both its code and its output. Script grew to about 20kb, but it's 10x better and I only had to make minor tweaks. Between the two, they found all sorts of hidden bugs and problems with it.
...I'm very sensitive to this issue, but fix the chatbots. We need to stop requiring ID for services, it's too much of a risk.
This is to control you, adults, and make you hand over your identity and other information to these providers. It's a scam, don't let the government do this to people.
AI doesn't generate well detailed images to be used this way, what's the angle here or is this just another ad for "AI"?
Self-hosted Atlassian products seem to be just fine.
As for what "they said", they also said this cloud shit would be cheaper. It isn't.
Wikipedia is an interesting concept and it works decently well as a place to go read a bunch of general information and find decent sources. But LLMs are feeding that information to people in a customized, granular format that meets their exact individual needs and desires. So yeah, probably not as interested in reading your giant wall of text when they want 6 specific lines out of it.
Remember when Encyclopædia Britannica was crying about you stealing their customers, Wikipedia? Yeah, this is what they experienced.
I also bought nice charging bricks. I don't need any more.
This post was indeed brought to you by ChatGPT.
Far from a MAGA voter, but there were exploding pagers not long ago...
"Though a program be but three lines long, someday it will have to be maintained." -- The Tao of Programming