Having something that both resembles in name to Mozilla Thunderbird and Intel Thunderbolt but is neither... Probably an AI came up with that name and idea
It definitely could have been worse: they could have taken a page out of their competitor's book and named three different products the same name.
I don't see what is so hard about switching the vast majority of common office computers.
From personal experience with customers, many have this immediate adverse reaction to even seeing an alternative product, especially when they have no experience of that product. In almost any size workplace I'd expect it to be an uphill struggle purely due to prejudicial attitudes. The only time I wouldn't expect an uphill struggle would be if the almost unanimous mood was against the current software, which to be frank with regard to Microsoft products, it isn't. They annoy the hell out of me, especially the multiple flavours of Microsoft Outlook.
Okay, so no rebuttal to any of my points.
I'll tell you what: I'll give you a chance to respond and make a counter-argument to what I *actually wrote* in good faith, or you can chalk this up as a clear win against your imaginary opponent. I honestly don't mind either way, but those are the only two options I'm offering.
Check: It's not genocide because Israel hasn't killed enough of them yet.
Okay, so you agree that Israel isn't committing genocide. It's been 3 years and Israel hasn't managed to kill all the Gazans, and the Gazans' population has actually gone up. You saying that it's genocide is a criminally evil lie. Crying wolf about genocide is awful.
You're witnessing a very just, and ethically demanded, war of defence against barbarism where the defenders are bending over backwards to protect civilians and the attackers are hiding behind poor civilians.
The plight of the "Palestinians" is nobody's fault but their own.
This is a war of civilization and the rule of law against barbarism and lawlessness. And yet you have a massive problem with that.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, nor is basic history of Israel's insertion into Palestine by the British.
It's a weird "genocide" that results in the "palestinian" population being six times what it was when Israel became a modern state.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means
Let's check the Israel apologist playbook:
Check: Imply Palestine isn't real.
Check: It's not genocide because Israel hasn't killed enough of them yet.
~70k civilians aren't enough, carpet-bombing their land isn't enough, forcing them into "safe zones" then bombing the safe zones, denying Palestinian refugees medical aid and food, the Israeli government routinely referring to Palestinians with sub-human wording doesn't tip you off either.
I have to say though, your argument of taking nearly a century's worth of population growth and comparing it to less than 3 years of a full-scale massacre is among the most dishonest uses of statistics I have ever seen. What will you do for an encore, take the Jewish European population growth rate over a century prior to the Holocaust and say, "nah, that wasn't a genocide either"?
The obvious conclusion is that unless the situation for Palestinians changes dramatically for the better, then Israel won't need to build extermination chambers, they will just let them choose between dying of poverty or a routine military criminal action.
Straight from the dictatorship handbook.
I would have thought that it could serve as distraction fodder.
There is one actually good reason for using a MS account: You can require MFA for access. You can't do that with a local account.
Which is why you make it an option, not a requirement.
I am here by the will of the people and I won't leave until I get my raincoat back. - a slogan of the anarchists in Richard Kadrey's "Metrophage"