Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:DRM EVERYWHERE (Score 1) 495

I would welcome an audit from the relevant authorities. I have stacks of CDs all over the place as I've been buying them like crazy from in recent years given the excellent exchange rates (and their specials!). I tried Napster back in the day, getting 92 and 128kbps MP3 files. All deleted now because they're crap. 192-256kbps MP3s ripped from CD in iTunes are just fine. I can't really tell the difference with FLAC anyway, and certainly don't welcome the extra hard disk space required to store them (or having to re-rip the lot!).

Comment Re:DRM EVERYWHERE (Score 1) 495

You've just described in detail why my reaction is not prejudice at all, but a very wise position. I have over a thousand CDs of classical music, and I DO have several different recordings of the same work, so there's no way I'm going to toss the whole lot up in the air and spend the rest of my life verifying whether each track is correct or not. Why fix what ain't broke?

Comment Re:Score: +99 Leeeeeeeenux! (Score 1) 88

Couldn't agree more. I used various Linux distros after Windows Vista eventually spelled the death of XP but when Ubuntu went bad, I finally decided to just buy a Mac. Never been happier. It took a little while to get past the inability to configure my WM "just so", but once I got beyond my OCD tendencies in that area, the macOS was perfect. I can't see Linux or Windows being worthy enough to entice me back for many years to come. I should finally start using Numbers, Pages, etc and stop using Open Office (which I retained as my exit strategy, but I don't think I'll be needing one quite frankly).

Comment Re:Engineering (Score 1) 341

OSX is such a disaster that every Mac I've ever come across is riddled with spyware, browser toolbar add-ons, etc.... oh wait, they were actually Windows machines. My bad. I haven't yet seen a Mac infected thus (including my own, which has no so-called "anti-virus" or other such software on it).

Comment Who is John Galt?, I hear the 10% say (Score 1) 1116

How long do you think the 10% of people who actually work for a living will go on happily slaving away to carry the other 90%? Sooner or later somebody like John Galt (from Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged", excellent book!) will enter the scene and get the productive people to pull up stumps and leave the other 90% to fend for their useless selves. I wouldn't blame them, either. What a complete joke this Sam Altman is. I guess I'd happily sit at home watching FX, AMC, Showtime, etc, while Sam Altman rakes in the millions from his worthless theories. LOL!

Comment This is bad for accessibility (Score 4, Insightful) 243

Firefox is the best browser to use for screen reader compatibility, and if it uses the same engine as Chrome, then there goes vision impaired users' sanity. Chrome - as much as I like it myself - is nowhere near as good as Firefox in this area. If Electron/Chromium get their engine up to scratch to match Firefox, then it won't be a problem (I find Firefox slow as a web developer anyway, though Firebug beats Chrome's developer tools, hands down).

Comment Re:He Should have been Banned Anyway (Score 2) 305

You know, I don't think he was being sarcastic, actually. Which is very sad because people who believe in "safe spaces" and "triggering" (ROFLMAO) are ruining free speech, and the media are enabling them. We need a replacement for Twitter, one whose founding principle is the protection of free speech.

Comment Twitter has a major problem with SJWs (Score 1, Insightful) 305

If someone like Stephen Fry is fed up with the social justice warriors ruining Twitter with their rabid offence taking, then that's got to be a major sign that Twitter is on the decline. If Jack Dorsey continues to capitulate to the feminazis then Twitter will end up like MySpace. It's already heading in that direction.

Comment Re:Wait just a minute! (Score 0) 568

No, he described what's actually going on. For decades now we've had computer models thrust into our faces ad nauseam, and yet when they are proven wrong years later, nobody wants to talk about it. They just fiddle with the figures and churn out a new (equally worthless) "model" and dial up the hysteria.

We've had a long record of alarmist rubbish now to show that more "climate science" is just a waste of OUR money. No thanks.

Slashdot Top Deals

There is no royal road to geometry. -- Euclid