Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Numbers (Score 2) 575

The one I looked had gave the airline the right to deny boarding. Once you have taken your seat, you have boarded. Being removed (in plain English, if not at law) is not being denied boarding.

IANAL, and this is certainly not legal advice.

Comment Re:Numbers (Score 2) 575

The return flight may be different, but then I have a wife and kids waiting for me to come home, so the reward for volunteering my seat needs to be a lot higher than it used to be.


You're in that much of a hurry to see wife and kids? I mean, you have to live with and see them every day.....seems like any little breaks would be welcome.

Don't be an idiot. Any parent might have any number of obligations that would make it high priority to get back home. The spouse might have a trip of their own to make, there might be a family trip planned, there might be tickets for shows, concerts, plays, etc., made as a family, there might be school events or athletic events that the parent had promised to be present at, etc., etc. When you are a parent, your time is not entirely your own, and so you cannot give it away as freely as when you are unattached.

Comment US Disinformation? (Score 4, Insightful) 294

This doesn't pass the smell test.

One thing that the Russians (and, for that matter, the Americans) understand well is protecting people who turn to their side. If the Russians send Snowden back, it will be a long time before they get another actual defector* to come out of the cold.

* Snowden is not a defector.

Comment My Biggest Beef: No confirmation step (Score 1) 489

My biggest beef is with mobile apps and web forms that do not have a confirmation step. It can be very hard to hit the right spot to toggle the right key on a touch screen, and yet many touch screen forms have the "send" button in the middle of other keys (say, next the the "delete" key). Press the wrong spot on the screen, and, poof, everything goes off, regardless of whether it was what you wanted.

Comment Re:so is there a good theory? (Score 2) 470

It doesn't, it just changes the numbers at which breakeven occurs to ones not easy to achieve on earth.

Unless you get to 1N/300000000W (in which case it is a well understood photon drive)

Yes, the claimed EM drive thrusts are much larger than a photon rocket would produce for the consumed power.

Comment Re:so is there a good theory? (Score 2) 470

It's a perpetual motion machine.
If you have an engine that produces one newton per 10W of input power, then move it 20 meters a second, you can extract 20W from this.
At 200m/s, 200W. Leaving 10 (or 190W) of free energy output after you subtract the first.

Agreed. Let's make this a little more rigorous.

Suppose that the device has a mass of X kg and produces A Newtons per Watt of power, with a power of 1 Watt. Turn it on. It is consuming 1 Joule / sec and producing A Newtons, so the device is (in free space) accelerated at A/X m/sec^2 and (after N seconds) is moving at NA/X m/sec, giving it a kinetic energy (1/2 mv^2) of (X/2) * (NA/X)**2 = N^2 A^2 / 2X Joules for an expenditure of N Joules.

When N^2 A^2 / 2X is >= N you break even (ignoring losses), i.e., when N >= 2 X / A^2. If X is 5 kg and A is ~ 5 x 10^-6 N/W (typical numbers claimed), then N needs to be ~ 4 x 10^11 seconds (12,675 years) and the device velocity will be 400 km/sec. Clearly, energy is being created and (at this relatively low velocity, 0.0013c) special relativity will not change this situation.

Whether this actually works and, if it did, whether it would be a practical means of creating energy are, of course, rather different questions.

Comment Re:so is there a good theory? (Score 2) 470

It seems that every test of EM drives by credible scientific organizations so far has been successful. Is there some theory now to explain how and why they work?

IMHO, no.

There are plenty of theories, but not one of them would stand up to five minutes of review by a proper theorist. When JASON reviewed Sonny White's work, they were (to be euphemistic) not kind about the theories presented.

Note, by the way, that testing in orbit is not the same as confirmation in orbit, which if you read carefully they are not claiming.

If you want to read about this closer to the source in Chinese, here you go.

Comment Re:I agree Apple is losing its' panache (Score 1) 230

The company that overtakes Mac as the main laptop of serious computer users ...

Actually, the market is NOT serious computer users.

Those stick with the PC models.

Mac users were/are mostly portable form factor.

I was in the IT business for 30 years and the only business I ever saw that had a Mac system, with desktops, servers and printers was the one I donated to Goodwill in favour of Windows shit.

The users at that firm were were appreciative.

Macs are for niche users -- mostly students and artists.

Sounds like a blast from 1990. Let's just say you obviously don't hang out at the same businesses that I do.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Our vision is to speed up time, eventually eliminating it." -- Alex Schure