It's not because they are allowed by law currently that it's moral or something that should be allowed by law.
Selling food with lead was legal not too long ago.

It's fun that they only do it when its a positive spin for the marketing.
When talking about LLM making mistakes and being mistake prone, they will immediately rename it as "hallucinations", because it implies it is a mistake of the system that can be fixed somehow.
It's the whole "having the cake and eating it too"

Predators still can pretend they're children (as they always do) and it's business as usual.
Now they're even "certified children" (tm)
It's about ending anonymity on the internet so your government and/or boeing can shot you for saying shit they dislike.

Of course they do!
And the big power switch to turn it off as well, which i do not recommend pulling if you're doing a really good run

If they get you, they will dump all the thetans in you.
You will be the entire church's thetan bucket.

Ripped out a pillar, tossed it in the air in the direction of the conference, then jumped on the pillar of course

Things with 621 on the name do tend to do dog-and-pony shows alright

Drones can replace a lot of very expensive military gears.
They're sadly the future of the war, a bunch of buzzing until a side is dead.
No more large scale soldiers, No more tanks, no more jets (other than stealth bombers that probably will be retrofitted as stealth drone droppers), just a plague of cheaply manufactured, gun carrying flying buzzers.

The federal budget is spent a lot more on medicare and social security than the military.
However the real problem here is that everything i listed above is just funneling money to very few monopolies that don't do a good job at all.
They're not shit because it lacks money, they're shit because they're mega monopolies that can freely control the price of everything, and you end up with a bad service.
It's more a problem of serving the corporations too much, rather than a problem of budget allocation.

It has not much to do with me specifically at all.
The theory is about using AI agents to create false people that can be used to "watch ads" and give improper revenue to websites and all that.

AI programming at least will create a golden era for hackers.
gigantic piles of easily exploitable code written by machines with infinite ego, and all the displaced but skilled programmers looking for a way to survive.

In this specific scenario i'm just as identified as much as the army of AI bots pretending to be people to give fake advertising money.
They need at least a "that's a real guy according to trustable company (tm)".

It's not about protecting the children and it will do nothing to protect the children.
The least evil theory i see floating around is that this is meant to create "identified people", so online advertising actually works.
Even if there's no actual data leak etc.. being an "adult" means you're a real human being possibly with a wallet.

If you can convince people to use computers instead of phones is already a pretty good step, as you can do a lot more on computers than on phones.

"Journalism" nowadays is just a bunch of biased people that spend the whole day on twitter instead of doing actual investigations and fact check.
So, people just go for the same thing but funny