mapkinase's Journal: One man spoke the truth, causing "furor" of the crooked

Australian mufti suggested that women who dressed provocatively provoke rape attempts. No wonder that the liberals reacted with "furor".

And, of course and unfortunately, there are some Muslims that are joining the chorus:

The country's most prominent female Muslim leader, Aziza Abdel-Halim, said the hijab did not "detract or add to a person's moral standards"

thus negating that commandments from the Creator revealed in The Holy Qur'an's have any relevance to the moral standards. Her website says:

The MWNNA works closely with leading progressive Muslim figures in Australia and overseas.

While the situation is more or less clear with this "pro-regressive" sister,
too bad to read similar remarks from this brother (who was more couragious on numerous previous occasions attracting fire from the infidels):

while an Islamic Council of Victoria spokesman, Waleed Ali, said it was "ignorant and naive" for anyone to believe that a hijab could stop sexual assault. "Anyone who is foolish enough to believe that there is a relationship between rape or unwelcome sexual interference and the failure to wear a hijab, clearly has no understanding of the nature of sexual crime," he told the Australian.

The website of Islamic Council of Victoria does not mention him as a "spokesman", BTW, only as a "member".

Subhan Allah! Have some Fear of the Creator, brothers and sisters.

Animals?

[jmiles]

So women are meat and men are animals who can't be expected to control their urges? What kind of society is it that has such low expectations for the individual? (One whose chief virtue is "submission" rather than seeking any kind of self-determination, I suppose.)

Given that you made an interesting comment in the emmigration thread yesterday, I'm surprised that no one has jumped on this journal entry today.