Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:And to think the DNC wanted to face Trump... (Score 1) 2837

Voting for someone on the basis of their sex is just as stupid as voting for someone on the basis of their race/skin-colour. You should be voting on the basis of their policies — far more complex than some genetic attribute.

Not stupid, logical.

Politicians are perceived to lie and break promises on a regular base, you don't know what to expect.
Then it is logical to vote on persistent attributes.
In any case, would Clinton have won your vote on Clinton would have the most political impact itself, women as president.

Comment Re:Fag control shot (Score 1) 372

Just because there may not be a genetic component to homosexuality doesn't mean that it isn't fixed or is somehow a choice.

Not relevant. Homosexuality is and has been for ages, a fact of life.
Nothing wrong, it's personal.
The problems start when sexuality of any kind are suppressed (e.g. religion, cultural). Male rejection usually stems from sexual uncertainty or fear of being hunted. Most get over it,bullying is a choice.

Comment Re:economic illiteracy (Score 1) 954

Minimum wage laws actually hurt low income and low skill workers twice: not only does it price many of them out of the labor pool, it also increases the cost of goods and services, which hurts low income groups the most.

Sure, let's prevent the low income groups from getting hurt and join them with the Bangladeshian sweatshop crew.
I'm not into history or economics but I have enough experience in life to know there
never has been such a thing as a free market, never is and never will be; power corrupts and people tend to group in peers.
Having large groups of people with and without money in the same area is a recipe for unrest -- bad for business.

Comment Re:Dammit Microsoft get with the program (Score 1) 101

> One of my clients issued me with one of the Nokia Winphones; it's OK although the UI is less refined than an iPhone or my Android Nothing wrong with the phone or the OS (8.1). Power for a week, faster than an Android, at 160 bucks. (lumia 640)
Does calling, browsing, whatsapping, integration with hotmail, downloadable maps, good camera apps.
The Android vs Winphone contest is quite the opposite of Linux vs Windows, e.g. apps stuck, no updates, poor battery time after a while, poor support, buggy interface, you name it.

Slashdot Top Deals

A sine curve goes off to infinity, or at least the end of the blackboard. -- Prof. Steiner