Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: The only thing I find it genuinely useful for (Score 1) 83

Actually it really is terrible at checking facts. It's a probability engine. Try asking it anything about music. This is the kind of result you'll get. Pure hallucination. It can't even figure out what key the works is in. And recommends a recording that doesn't exist.

https://chatgpt.com/share/6a6873a5-b874-83e8-bc1d-5e21a302769a?ogimg=plain

Comment Re: AI skeptic, but... (Score 1) 128

Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B and Qwen 3.6 27B Coder were the largest 2 I tried to run. Neither really "runs" on my 3060 Ti / 8 GB or GTX 1660 Super. Crawl is more like it. But even when waiting a long time for jobs to complete, the result on the codebase analysis was worse than useless - only hallucinated findings.
For other simpler tasks, I have seen Qwen write some useful code. But it often rewrites unwanted code as well, and breaks that one in the process.

Comment Re: AI skeptic, but... (Score 1) 128

Have you tried small models ? I have. They hallucinate way too much. I had codex run a whole bunch of tests over the weekend to analyze a relative small code base. It automatically downloaded many models from huggingface, with various quants, and tried them all. Few completed within a timeframe that a human would be willing to wait for. We are talking 1 hour timeout. But for the ones that did, the report was mostly incorrect, with the local models hallucinating 5 different flaws that didn't actually exist at all - according to the large models.

It's fair to say that small models are far less useful than large ones. They have some use, but ultimately are unsuitable for many tasks.

I do agree we need orders of magnitude improvements in performance. Not sure if we will see them.

Comment Re: idk if this makes me impressed with the agent (Score 2) 80

To be fair, it could have used a Wifi NIC, if it had access to one in its "isolated environment".

I would have been mildly impressed if there was network level authentication such as Radius for either Ethernet or Wifi NIC, and the agent managed to crack that and gain access.

I would be more impressed if it had access to a soundcard, or some other peripheral not intended for networking, and managed to escape the sandbox that way. Of course, we would be hearing all about it if it was that ingenious.

Comment Re: As a GM EV owner (Score 1) 159

Yes, I have certainly seen Google maps do stupid things - sometimes extremely stupid things - when routing. Most of the time it does a very good job.

While you can't optimize by distance vs time, you can optimize for fuel efficiency, which might slightly alter the route though not necessarily in the way you want. But it could send you on some lower speed city street segments than freeware in theory. It won't save time for sure.

The only way to do what you want is set waypoints, I believe, but that defeats the purpose of the routing.

As far as accidents, they can happen at any time. Sometimes, I am in the middle of a drive. Suddenly, Maps becomes aware of an accident 2 miles ahead, and reroutes me. Since I'm not a precog, I turn on the maps for this type of thing. On a recent road trip, it rerouted me to a city street adjacent and parallel to the freeway. I got to see exactly how about that accident was, with everyone else stuck in traffic. Probably saved at least 10 minutes.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you don't have time to do it right, where are you going to find the time to do it over?

Working...