Comment Re:Other Categories? (Score 1) 722
The internet, being a place of danger, gets Sauron's place's names for that reason
Ah. Here that's the virtual windows boxes. The internet has some nice spots too
The internet, being a place of danger, gets Sauron's place's names for that reason
Ah. Here that's the virtual windows boxes. The internet has some nice spots too
Yeah, though i got to name only one server (our family LAN's server), we name all of our computers after cities, countries, regions, mountains, etc. from Tolkien's world. Whether these are fictional or not i will leave up to the reader to decide. It seemed logical to use places instead of people, because then you can imagine users living, or have a home, in that place. It is very neat to login as manwe@taniquetil, while it seems strange to be a person in another person. Moreover, processes can just as well be imagined as going on at places (carried out by employees for example) as in the mind of a person (the cpu, i know...). I suppose that would mean the human users are some kind of lords over the "slaves" doing all the pre-programmed work, but at least they feed them electricity, and i'm not sure messing with some historic or fictional hero's mind would be more politically correct. Of course, processes should then be named as processes, and not as something else, though i still feel sorry to kill evolution as much as to kill empathy.
Mind you: we are not complaining about lack of options; just proposing new ones
I think a class that studies those who believe in UFOs would definitely be worth of an anthropology class.
You bet. That's exacly what an Anthro teacher of mine is doing. ^_^
Well, to be honest,not exactly: UFO sightings are just one subtype of the phenomena he proposes to approach more with attentiveness and less with skeptiscism, especially in the study of religion. Basically, his point is that people believe in something, UFO's as alien visitors for example, this fact - the believer, not necessarily the object of belief - is significant in itself and worthy of study.
While as humans we can strongly believe or disbelieve in intelligent extraterrestrial life circling our little planet Earth, anthropologists have no business in proving or disproving the actual existence of it - that's the job of physicists and other natural scientists. For anthropologists, it is the act of belief, the reason, the manner, and all other intricacies, that matter.
I described his view in a short story at my universities anthro department blog, but unfortunately this post is in Dutch and google translate does a very crappy job.
And regarding bias: we are all biased in one way or another. Consider the idea expressed in one of the previous comments that lawn mowing is a "normal" activity. Yes, for some of us, it is. But for people not grown up with the idea of short-mowed lawns, it may seem as alien an activity as sighting UFO's.
In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982