Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:And when they kill the license servers? (Score 1) 22

That game will then be playable completely digitally, without the need to ever insert the disc, as long as you (or a member of your family account) is logged in.

The ability to convert disc-based Xbox games to digital copies could be especially important, as rumors suggest Microsoft’s upcoming Project Helix console won’t be available with a disc drive. That means claiming a digital entitlement could be the only way to achieve backward compatibility for hundreds of millions of Xbox game discs going forward.

IOW, for as long as Microsoft keeps the necessary department funded and the license servers running.

Then you use the disc.

If the license server is gone, you have the disc.

Comment Re:Technology to the rescue again (Score 2) 106

What a great thing technology is. Instead of burning books like in the olden days to suppress information we can now scan and destroy them and lock the information away behind so-called AI. The paper can then be recycled into documents that we must all carry around to prove we are good little humans... papers please.

This is copyright law issue, not a technology one.

Once you scan a book, you have to destroy the book.

Google books had page turning robots at libraries and scanning books 10-20 years ago.

Comment Does each disc have a unique ID? (Score 1) 22

Since Xbox already tried to do something related when releasing XBox one, I assume they have been adding a serial number to every disc that can be read by the laser.

So if I borrow a game disc from the library, what happens? It is tied to my account until someone else puts it in their console?

Also I assume Microsoft has been tracking every game with their unique IDs. Steam already creates a unique id for every single individual instance of a game but once redeemed it is forever tied to a single account. Steam wouldn't need to track a unqiue id of a game. What additional data would Microsoft get from their disc tracking?

Comment Re:Personal experience (Score 1) 70

Eastern diets, esp Indian diets, who have very little meat don't fare better either.

The only thing our bodies aren't designed for are ultra-processed foods: sugar, "vegetable" oil and refined carbs.

With GLP-1, fad diets and the whole concept of diets is gone. You can deal with eating bad foods if you eat little of it. Of course, once out of GLP-1, you'll overeat the processed foods if you don't improve your habits.

People are stuck in pre-GLP-1 world. You don't have to worry about diets, GLP-1 is the ultimate diet pill.

Comment Re:Well it was inevitable (Score 3, Interesting) 162

They are willing to build data centers at scale with no regard for the environment or citizen's opinions on the matter, subsidize the hardware, reverse engineer the models, and distill the training done in the US. The only thing holding the US back is itself. We honestly shouldn't compete, because the playing field is far from level. Let them spend the money and destroy their resources, and we'll distill THEIR models.

LOL. We bet the farm on this.

Also, we don't have to distill their models. Their models are open-source, open weights.

They did jump ahead a few times and we did use their techniques and learnings to jump past them in the next round.

Comment Re:Chinese models = Chinese Guardrails? (Score 1) 162

I"m curious...do these Chinese models contain Chinese guard rails?

I mean, will it censor you if you ask about the Chinese premier looking like Winnie the Pooh or tienaman (sp?) square....will it say it can't answer that...or give answers that only praise china?

Genuine question with potential genuine concerns....

They remove that kind of data from the training and so model has no idea what you're talking about. They don't add guardrails after the fact.

Anyways, its open weights/open source. You can fine tune it to your liking. Lots of companies do that. Even the company Cursor that SpaceX just bought for $40 billion used a Chinese model, fine tuned it and ran the company on it.

Comment Re:Of course they don't (Score 1) 100

"More fundamentally, AI models may not understand 'stakes' as humans perceive them."

Of course they don't. They don't *understand anything*. They just predict which word(s) is statistically most likely to come after all these other word(s).

This is just as reductionist as saying emotions are just chemicals, our thoughts are just electrical spikes and the entire internet is just 0s and 1s.

A complex system is not just a lot of the basic operations but has inherently different characteristics as a complex system.

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

I don't know what the solution AI is but it has to be found.

The problem is that you're looking for a kind of solution that doesn't exist. There probably isn't now any undergraduate math problem that AI can't do, and if there is, there soon won't be. Trying to find kinds of problems that students can do but AI can't is fruitless.

The only answer is to get students to understand why they really need to do the work themselves -- and it's the same reason that they need to learn integration by parts even though the CAS can do it far faster and more accurately -- because learning develops their minds. And, for the students who are unwilling to understand, test them on it in a context where they can't rely on AI: Pencil and paper tests in a room free of any sort of electronics.

I disagree. It is a waste of time.

But, I think you're probably right in a different way.

Even when I was in college decades ago, we used to say, "what you learn in school doesn't matter, what matters is that you showed you can jump all the hoops to get the degree"

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

If AI can do your homework, the homework is wrong. The teacher needs to create a homework that is AI proof.

I don't think there is any homework that is AI proof. If the kids can do it, the AI can do it. Hell, the AI can probably do it better than the teacher.

The solution to my calculus was to make the problem into a "word problem" where you had to get obtain the equation.

Yeah, good luck writing a basic calculus word problem that frontier AI models can't do today.

Seriously, give it a shot and I'll feed it to a few models.

This is my pet theory but we don't need to do homeworks like we think of where we ask questions and expect answers from the students.

If AI can generate answers, we should ask people to make questions as homework.

Other camps will say homework should be to generate answers and understand how to use AI to generate answers, like using a calculator or CAS like a tool and be able to verify it.

Word problems were a solution to CAS. I don't know what the solution AI is but it has to be found. If it can't be found then there is no reason for the field to exist and no reason for people to study it anymore.

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

homework doesn't need to be AI proof at all, whats important is how the homework is checked. If the child can demonstrate an understanding then whether they used a text book, google search or AI the goal has been achieved. So what needs to change is how they check the child actually understood and can demonstrate the ability.

That's just time wasting.

Heard stories of older professors who would do 3x3 matrix inversions by hand in front of the classroom. Going back to my example, doing integration by parts over and over again in front of the students.

Slashdot Top Deals

try again

Working...