Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Of course they don't (Score 1) 100

"More fundamentally, AI models may not understand 'stakes' as humans perceive them."

Of course they don't. They don't *understand anything*. They just predict which word(s) is statistically most likely to come after all these other word(s).

This is just as reductionist as saying emotions are just chemicals, our thoughts are just electrical spikes and the entire internet is just 0s and 1s.

A complex system is not just a lot of the basic operations but has inherently different characteristics as a complex system.

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

I don't know what the solution AI is but it has to be found.

The problem is that you're looking for a kind of solution that doesn't exist. There probably isn't now any undergraduate math problem that AI can't do, and if there is, there soon won't be. Trying to find kinds of problems that students can do but AI can't is fruitless.

The only answer is to get students to understand why they really need to do the work themselves -- and it's the same reason that they need to learn integration by parts even though the CAS can do it far faster and more accurately -- because learning develops their minds. And, for the students who are unwilling to understand, test them on it in a context where they can't rely on AI: Pencil and paper tests in a room free of any sort of electronics.

I disagree. It is a waste of time.

But, I think you're probably right in a different way.

Even when I was in college decades ago, we used to say, "what you learn in school doesn't matter, what matters is that you showed you can jump all the hoops to get the degree"

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

If AI can do your homework, the homework is wrong. The teacher needs to create a homework that is AI proof.

I don't think there is any homework that is AI proof. If the kids can do it, the AI can do it. Hell, the AI can probably do it better than the teacher.

The solution to my calculus was to make the problem into a "word problem" where you had to get obtain the equation.

Yeah, good luck writing a basic calculus word problem that frontier AI models can't do today.

Seriously, give it a shot and I'll feed it to a few models.

This is my pet theory but we don't need to do homeworks like we think of where we ask questions and expect answers from the students.

If AI can generate answers, we should ask people to make questions as homework.

Other camps will say homework should be to generate answers and understand how to use AI to generate answers, like using a calculator or CAS like a tool and be able to verify it.

Word problems were a solution to CAS. I don't know what the solution AI is but it has to be found. If it can't be found then there is no reason for the field to exist and no reason for people to study it anymore.

Comment Re:Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 1) 153

homework doesn't need to be AI proof at all, whats important is how the homework is checked. If the child can demonstrate an understanding then whether they used a text book, google search or AI the goal has been achieved. So what needs to change is how they check the child actually understood and can demonstrate the ability.

That's just time wasting.

Heard stories of older professors who would do 3x3 matrix inversions by hand in front of the classroom. Going back to my example, doing integration by parts over and over again in front of the students.

Comment Wrong homework. Homework needs to be AI proof. (Score 4, Insightful) 153

This reminds me of my college days when calculus teacher would ask me to integrate an expression and CAS could do it it in a fraction of a section. Instead we were expected to spend half an hour doing it, documenting all the "tricks".

If AI can do your homework, the homework is wrong. The teacher needs to create a homework that is AI proof.

The solution to my calculus was to make the problem into a "word problem" where you had to get obtain the equation. The integration part would then be done by CAS.

In the AI world, it can't be questions that is trivially solvable by AI.

Comment Climate participation trophy (Score 0, Troll) 175

Americans should be able to buy the car they want.

Affordable vehicle ownership is essential to the American Dream and a primary driver of economic mobility out of poverty in the United States. Americans rely on vehicles to reach jobs, education, health care, and essential services. This is especially true in rural areas and regions without robust public transit.

We should be improving affordability and expanding consumer choice and ultimately advancing the American Dream by making it easier to reach jobs, grow small businesses, and participate fully in the transportation and logistics systems that power the U.S. economy.

Comment Re:Use BitTorrent for downloads (Score 2) 24

One idea to reduce costs is use BitTorrent for distribution of the packages.
Web site hosts only a torrent file.
Everyone has to download via the torrent file. If nobody is seeding.... well then bad luck.
If somebody wants a URL for the package manager, they will be required to download from torrent and set up their own local mirror.

Yep, package distribution via peer to peer would happen if those "grants" dried up.

There is every incentive to never have such a system even pop up for the companies selling centralized data access.

Comment OpenAI hasn't laid off tens of thousands workers (Score 1) 47

You probably meant Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Google that are laying off employees and are making huge speculative investments.

However, they were already sitting on mountains of cash and so can afford to burn it.

I know the narrative is that AI capital investment is bad but this is a bit of a stretch.

Comment Re:They don't matter much now. (Score 1) 53

People used to tell me "Well, you'll need a degree to work for a big company like IBM." Now IBM is a giant H1B offshoring company that competes with Tata and Wipro. They don't do much American hiring at all now anyway. I have no degree. I have hired around 200 people in my career and seen multiple times when entitled degree holders get absolutely crushed by a room full of seat-of-the-pants coders with experience. I wouldn't count on a degree getting you anywhere in IT beyond academia.

  First off, they are going to teach you dated trendy shit that'll be obsolete before you graduate or the "hardcore" schools will teach you ML and LISP that won't help you much IRL. The programmers you do your technical interview won't give a fuck about your degree. What they care about is not having to carry your weight and making sure you can actually help the project, not just check in "code" in their VCS.

You're absolutely right about not needing degrees.

However, people without a degree have some sort of fear that they missed out on something without a degree. I tell them they didn't but are more reticent to switch jobs and look for better opportunities.

I disagree with you about other stuff you said but I don't want to get into that now.

Comment Re:How tech companies pretend to need H1Bs (Score 1) 231

Despite having worked with many H1B coworkers, I have seen NO indication that they are superior in ability, on average, compared to their US coworkers. Like all employees, their skill level tends to follow the normal curve. A few are outstanding, most are average, and a few are sub-par.

As for replacing an existing H1B position, in one notable case I was told by my VP: "We have to open this job because H1B rules require that we do so. But I want you to find something wrong with each candidate so we can make sure that no one else will qualify."

These are the kinds of shenanigans that companies routinely pull. They are highly skilled at complying with the letter of the law, while completely obliterating the spirit of the law.

I agree. Everybody falls in a bell curve but when in the instances an H1b comes out on top, the companies want the top candidate rather than rejecting the top candidate for a lower candidate that is not H1b. Not saying h1b is always better; but when they are better they are not rejected due to their h1b in favor of a local candidate.

On your second point, once you have someone who is already doing the job and doing well in it, there is very little reason to want to take on a new person. The law wants you to replace him/her but everybody would want to keep their co-worker. The law needs a reason to reject and people will find it.

Again, this is not in the spirit of the law though fine with the letter of the law.

I'm against H1b. It was initially created as a way for foreign workers to get into the US where local skill was not available. The green card was followed shortly afterwards and people would be in h1b for only a short time. The current way of students getting into h1b, Indians having decades long h1b etc is all bad and not in the spirit of how it was initially conceived. The path from working to green card and citizenship should be very very short.

Comment Re:Fix the real problem (Score 1) 231

Here's an idea.
How about each $100k paid for a H-1B visa is used to educate an American bright enough to fill that job but too poor to put themselves through higher education.
I'm all for taxes to solve problems so long as the money raised is actually spent fixing the problem.
It's not that the country doesn't have the talent. It's just too much talent is going to waste.

It is to pay for the tax cuts and interest payments on the giant national debt.

DoE will be dissolved soon.

Slashdot Top Deals

"We shall reach greater and greater platitudes of achievement." -- Richard J. Daley

Working...