Comment Because (Score 1) 211
If youâ(TM)ve used it for any length of time, you learn that itâ(TM)s inconsistent about its capacity but always consistent in its desire to convince you of its capacity.
Itâ(TM)s better than a search engine for getting concise general answers but itâ(TM)s confined to what it was trained on.
Which still relies on human effort.
The âoethinkingâ features are primarily about having it create its own guardrails but it still doesnâ(TM)t know how to ask questions or communicate assumptions or shortcuts.
At least theyâ(TM)ve mostly stopped telling me how to execute the throwaway scripts Iâ(TM)ve asked them to generate.
I donâ(TM)t know, ultimately, but I think that anyone who thinks AI is unquestionably good are incapable of reading or writing with depth. Canâ(TM)t miss something you donâ(TM)t know is there.
Combine that with the tech money hype cycle and the investment ouroboros? Itâ(TM)s hard to trust anyoneâ(TM)s motives if theyâ(TM)re pushing AI. Seems like marketing minds caught up in their own verisimilitude.