Comment Run that through an LLM please (Score 1) 68
Good lord those paragraphs give me a headache, this may be one of the few cases where an LLM can provide value.
Good lord those paragraphs give me a headache, this may be one of the few cases where an LLM can provide value.
Can you leave the forests alone now while protecting your precious cribs?
Huh?
Are you obe of those miswired sense freaks who can actually smell words on a page? What if AI hid my posts from you at your browser, thus preserving my right to self-express and your mental hygiene? Win-win?
Is your system so fragile it cannot tolerate even one harmless nonviolent text-only asshole, scapegoating me, then whining about a much bigger threat to their little mental cradle, which I had nothing to do with? So why did they ban me? Why can't I be an asshole and not be the much bigger threat you never even saw coming?
Ebiikes are a legal workaround loophole for motorcycles.
You realize there are a bunch of homes available for sale in all sorts of places for next to nothing. The problem isn't "housing", it is "housing where people want to live". Declining population in places like Italy have created housing collapse where nice houses aren't sold, and sit empty, and they'll pay you to move into one.
It isn't colonial, it is industrial. The current format of school is that of preparing for a factory workforce. We are post industrial, knowledge/AI/Whatever it will be called workforce.
Educators need to come to grip with getting EVERY child their MAX educational value we can. This means breaking the rows and columns of desks in a classroom, and getting kids their most valuable education they can get. This means some will do much better than others. Talent has gradations. Not everyone can be a Astro Physics expert.
As someone who has been repeatedly banned by humans, can I cry you a river? When you blamed me for driving away users, did you see AI coming?
"fair" is subjective. What you think is "fair" isn't really fair. It is objectively unfair to use qualitative terms in discussion of policy.
What would be fair, is that Government live within the means we ALREADY tax out of the public. Cut Spending first. Then, when all cuts that can be made, are made, then MAYBE we can have a discussion on tax increases.
Its Not Your Money.
Envy isn't a virtue.
The problem here, is "fairness" is subjective, not objective.
Use of that particular term is deliberate tug on the emotional center of brains. it works, which is why Progressives ALWAYS use it.
Which is exactly what they said a hundred years ago when they instituted the "income tax".
Rich people will move out. And take their wealth with them.
Taxes are regressive. All of them.
"In modern cars, it can only help visibility"
Until the screen fucks with your night time vision.
Fuck that just get ones of those retina-searing flashlights out of China and just aim it at your side view mirror.
Is declining fertility the solution?
ASCII a stupid question, you get an EBCDIC answer.