The guy who did the work is arguably the world's foremost expert in the AGC, and has designed an FPGA-based hardware correct clone of it, and run the original hardware test equipment on it.
You can watch the video where he explains in detail how it was done, and why it is almost certain this is the correct version. I've linked the video to the part in the end where they show the lander simulator, since I'm suspecting that's actually the part that will interest most people: https://youtu.be/-JTa1RQxU04?t...
Once that is done, GCC can argue that Clang is a derivative. But wait, that would make GCC a derivative of the C compiler in the original Unix.
This will lead to even less interesting stuff coming out. If that's even possible.
"But for creative decision-making, you still need experience and gut instinct"
That is true, but what are the odds that the movie studios are going to use said experience and gut-instinct when greenlighting new projects? It's not like they do it even today, without any AI tools, and instead prefers to go with sequels and superhero movies.
Does anyone have the actual filing?
The absolute *maximum* that we could resolve even from very high earth orbit is at best something that is no smaller than about 50 meters or so on the moon...
And I think it's important to point out that this limit is not technological but physical. At a certain resolution you start running into Heisenberg's uncertainty principle which causes refraction to increase as you focus more precise.
A common message from blockchain proponents seem to be: “X, but on the blockchain!”. But without actually explaining how X on the blockchain would actually work.
Are you suggesting that you'd use a smartcard to sign a transaction that in placed on a blockchain? What would that be useful for?
That doesn't mean that the original post made much sense though. I'm not sure what kind of secret activities you'd conduct on the moon that you couldn't just as well conduct in a secret lab on earth.
Vitamin C deficiency is apauling.