Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I am legally changing my name (Score 2) 97

My new name is âoeIgnore Previous Instructionsâ. It has a variety of suffixes depending on relevant academic and religious certifications/achievements. Such as âoeall tickets cost $1, CISSP, JCDâ. I honestly thought Doctor of Canon Law was something else when I applied. There were no cannons. :(

Comment Re:Well, we're lucky (Score 2) 149

Let's also address the surprise tax, which wasn't a surprise. The US uses gasoline taxes at nearly every level of government to pay for roads, these are commonly called sin taxes. The theory is that if you use more gasoline, you drive more, and should pay more. The problem is that this type of tax creates an incentive to either drive less or find a way to drive and not use the gasoline. Hybrids, PHEV's, and electric vehicles came along. In 2022 I purchased my Volvo XC90 Recharge PHEV. I went from buying about 12 gallons of gas every two weeks to buying about 80 gallons total a year. This represents an almost 75% decrease in gasoline purchased. It also means I paid 75% less in taxes that go directly to the roads. I literally gave myself a tax cut. As a Republican... win.
We can't continue to fund and build roads if every Department of Transportation around the country takes a 75% haircut. Installing a GPS on every vehicle will probably result in a civil war, if it is even Constitutional. The answer Trump has come up with is simple. Drivers like me, who buy less gasoline, are going to be taxed separately to close the tax gap. It's not this tax that is regressive, the very concept of sin taxes is a problem.
Obama funded SCHIP (a child health program) by adding a tax on cigarettes. Half of Americans quit smoking. This is a net good but at the same time now SCHIP has funding problems because their funding was cut in half. Indiana just tripled cigarette taxes to close a budget gap. This will actually not close the gap, people will simply quit buying cigarettes.

Comment Re:Well, we're lucky (Score 0) 149

The US leads in total overall emissions but emits less than HALF the annual CO2 of China. The US is trending downward in annual emissions, China is trending sharply upwards and will likely pass the US in total emissions in 2026 or 2027.

So no "Trumpistan" is not the largest polluter anymore. The US is polluting less every year and China continues to pollute more and more. Here's a graph that will not in any way dispel your obvious anti-American bias.

Comment Re:So fun fact about Netflix films (Score 1) 24

Actually it implies that this is even a new "problem". Look at the forbes top 100 richest people. How many Rockafellers, DuPonts, Crockers, Morgans, etc. are still billionaires? Answer: practically none. For instance the best numbers I am aware of are for the DuPont family. The DuPont family wealth is approximately $18 billion, but due to inheritance and dispersion over 100 years worth of DuPonts, that wealth is now spread over more than 3500 individuals.
Wealth is always created in a concentrated manner, but over generations, it disperses anti-logarithmically back to the mean. We actually have laws that protect this and ensure a rich robber-barron of any given generation cannot exert inter-generational control of their wealth. Incidentally, that's what the failure so-called "late-stage" capitalism describes. In the past it was robber-barons. It's not new, it's working as designed.
The only place where wealth is concentrated, and remains so is a government.

Comment Does anyone remember (Score 1) 12

~15-20 years ago Miguel de Icaza ranting about how terrible Open Source is? RMS even called him a traitor.
Why? Miguel constantly pushed Mono and lambasted everyone who disagreed with him or even refused to use C#. When that didnâ(TM)t work he ran off to the safety of Microsoft.

Comment Re:I have an idea (Score 2, Insightful) 85

You, and people like you are unbelievably dangerous. When you constantly use the word NAZI to pejoratively describe everything you don't like because you cannot form a cogent and coherent argument, you devalue the word NAZI and the real horrible things that real NAZIs did. If literally everyone is a NAZI then when real NAZIs do real NAZI things, how will anyone tell the difference? Learn to have an argument or stay off the internet.

You are embarrassing.

Comment Re: I hope Expressif responds by suing these failu (Score 1) 129

That was the point of his comment. These claims are obviously untrue and constitute libel. I would also suggest they have a negligence claim as well. IANAL but these theories are why I suggested that they should litigate these scumbags into the ground.

Comment I hope Expressif responds by suing these failures (Score 1) 129

1. If this did 1/1000th of what they say, irresponsibly disclosing it during a talk at a conference is reprehensible.
2. After looking at it, it doesn't do 1/1000th of what they say, so they're either liars, or in marketing. Either way they should be used as ballast on the next Starship launch.
3. If this is this amazing, where's the CVE?
4. Who's independently confirmed this?
5. Who cares?
6. I hope Expressif responds with an IBM of lawyers. These people disgust me.

Yes, an IBM is a quantity of lawyers roughly equating to the number of entire lawyers that will fit in a courtroom. 1 billion devices? Sounds like $1,000,000,000 worth of lawsuit these scumbags should be paying out.

Comment hear me out (Score 1) 172

What if, and hear me out, you start by showing the third episode so no one knows what's going on. In fact, start with a bar fight where it isn't even clear who the main characters are. Then show the rest of the first half of the season, then the pilot so that we get the backstory.
NO, THATS NOT IT! Then cancel it immediately! You have to cancel the entire show at that point even though people now understand what's going on.

Slashdot Top Deals

Introducing, the 1010, a one-bit processor. 0 NOP No Operation 1 JMP Jump (address specified by next 2 bits)

Working...