Copyright is property no? If not then I am mistaken.

Is this the same with other industries or is AI alone in it being entirely based on the theft of others property?

Except what a shocking amount of people seem to want. Look at games like Palworld there is a clear market that they have not tried.

Iâ(TM)d always assumed thermals and cost would be the limiting factor in chip thickness.

I hadnâ(TM)t heard about that issue. Iâ(TM)ll look it up thank you :).

I am surprised theyâ(TM)re able to get access to enough Spotify data to conclude vpn usage. Iâ(TM)d have thought Spotify would be very cagey about giving access to any metrics.

I dont think adding an AI thats as often wrong as it is right will undo the brand damage just compound it.

Have you seen the constant hype around LLMs. They are so desperate to make something more of it than it really is. Sadly a lot of people seem to believe it.

Bold to assume there will be enough tax revenue to bail them out once theyâ(TM)re finished wiping out jobs.

I didnâ(TM)t realise. I assumed it was a central department. Thank you for explaining :).

Surely it would have been so much easier to stipulate someone was to be given employment in the legal team that deals with such requests.

Amazon, google, Microsoft, cloudflare any one of these go down and huge chunks of the internet go dark. These are just the ones Iâ(TM)ve heard of. I bet there are companies all of the above rely on that I havenâ(TM)t heard of. The internet is not as resilient as it was.

Neither AI nor consultants back their product with any guarantee on reliability or correctness. Take the cheaper one.

I canâ(TM)t work out why AI would be needed for this. Most of the profit theyâ(TM)re making is people leaving their money in low interest paying accounts or in accounts with fees they have no use for. AI isnâ(TM)t going to help these people anymore than a list of things to check will.

The tough on crime party sure loves committing crimes