At this point I’d love to have a Harvard educated Civics professor explain exactly what the US Department of Education actually does. To the US Department of Education.
Gives out money for special ed, sets standards, and makes sure schools aren't discriminating against black kids (you don't think they would actually do that, do you?)
But yours is a country that along with Myanmar and Liberia can't embrace the metric system because reasons.
In America, we use both systems because mental math is easy for us.
Noting that it is good to hear that individual happiness and well being are not correlated to how much money you have.
That's not what the study said. The study said that happiness is not correlated to inequality. Inequality is different than how much money you have.
If you're going to criticize a study, at least think first.
Guido van Rossum said, without realizing that he was saying it... that nobody should have to make code that isn't aesthetically pleasing and that can't be made to look like a series of poetic stanzas.
I agree with him.
That's why I don't use Python.
We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication and develop a new equilibrium in terms of our “theory of the mind” that accounts for humans being equipped with these new cognitive amplifier tools as we relate to each other. This is the product design question we need to debate and answer.
Interpretation:
"I'm tired of hearing about slop, stop talking about it. Now build me something I can sell, or I'll throw chairs."
"Pok pok pok, P'kok!" -- Superchicken