Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×
User Journal

Journal Journal: Esperanto 2

Wow. It is truly amazing how strongly people feel about Esperanto. My last few posts got an incredible response. Some was positive, and some negative, but very extremely polarized.

I try to spread knowledge of Esperanto because I believe in the ideals, and because the more people who speak it, the more I get to use it. But I speak Esperanto because it's a fun and inexpensive hobby. The return on the time investment is very high. If everyone stopped writing things in Esperanto right now, I could read until I died and still not finish it all. But people are still writing. And generally, posting their work on the net. So, free reading material. And not just garbage- often it's the masterpieces translated from other languages, to which I'd never be exposed otherwise.
Now, I understand when someone says they aren't interested, or don't have time, or just dislike the idea. But people really get upset and offended by it! Ok, I admit, I do provoke. A little, teensy bit. But, still...

Often I hear or read, "Oh that's that made-up language." Yep, and so was Greek. Alexander the Great (supergenius that he was) made up Greek to be a common language for the lands he conquered. We are still absorbing the Greek language into English today. Simply because a language didn't "evolve" or didn't come down from the Tower of Babel doesn't negate it's validity or usefulness or appropriateness. That would be like dismissing the automobile as a means of transportation based on the fact that it didn't have a horse pulling it. Oh wait- that did happen, at first. Hmmm.


Journal Journal: The evil emanating from Mordor^H^H^HMicrosoft. 1

Those with a Windows box, try this experiment: Open the calculator and switch to scientific. Switch the mode to binary. Now try to subtract, lets say, 111111 from 11101011. You should get -01010100, or in place of the negative sign a series of 1's indicating the sign. Yet, for some reason, you don't. What kind of screwed up piece of dried-up dog crap is that? How did Bill's team manage to take a computer, something which natively speaks binary, and get it to forget how? Just to spell it out: if you are running Windows, you are running an operating system(!) designed by programmers who can't get their system to perform mathematics! Depressing, isn't it?

I realize that KCalc displays the number with a series of ones instead of a neg sign. But hit the dec button to switch to decimal and you get a reasonable answer of -172. (63-235=-172, so this is the correct answer. Try it on a windows machine and your answer is definitely not -172 in base ten.

The calculator is not a new computing concept. Microsoft has shipped one with their OS since, what, 3.0 for sure. What a damn embarrassment for the geek community that we are creeping up on 2 decades later and they still cant get it right.


Journal Journal: I just don't understand where RIAA is coming from

How can downloading music be a crime? For a crime to have occurred, there must be a victim. Unless RIAA can prove that I would have bought the CD (I would not have!), then there are no damages from the action. No victim. No crime.

I can hear the voices crying, "Copyright!" but somewhere along the way we lost sight of what copyrights and patents were intended for, and how publishing is supposed to work, and work for the people. Let me explain.

The internet is the next evolution of the library. If you doubt this, visit your local college, possibly the birthplace of the library, and see how much of that college's library is on its network and/or available online. I can borrow a book from a library, copy down every title and jot, and keep that copy forever. In fact, that was exactly what was done until the printing press was invented. Then it became unfashionable. This is the very basis of the word publish, which means to make public. In fact I should be able to sell copies too, as long as I attribute the author. After all, he made his work public. It was my effort to copy all that information down. Now, the task of copying that information has become simpler. That is not my fault or concern as far as this topic goes. I paid for the equipment used to make such copies.

I really have a problem with paying someone for their thoughts. I have no problem paying someone for thier effort. But it is a one-time payment. Just as I don't pay for my toaster every time I roast toast, I'm not going to pay a musician for every time I listen to sound produced from my own equipment using a formula that musician belched out 30 years ago which I happen to have a copy of. I pay musicians for singing or playing. Live. If you are a musician and you are getting paid for anything but live music or the physical medium your music is recorded on, you are wrong. If you don't think so, you need to re-read the previous paragraph, and talk to God some more. And if you are a gospel musician and you are doing anything more than recouping the losses for the cost of publishing, don't bother, because the god you serve is Mammon. You're in dire jeopardy of going to Hell. Do not pass GO. Do not collect your eternal reward. Sorry to be so blunt, but you should have figured that one out.

Since we are on the subject, lets talk about the number one best seller of all time. The Bible. Now, its all there. Anyone can copy it. It's encouraged, just don't leave anything out or add anything to it. Yet it sells and sells and sells. Which is worth more, the copy at the book store, or the one hand copied by Great-grandpa Jones? But I digress. CD's aren't going away. Paper books aren't going away. People are still going to want the name brand. Just as people go buy Levi pants, when they could buy the machinery and disect a thrown out pair of the neighbor's pants and make their own, and have them fit better. Now, the labor/money cost of copying your neighbor's Metallica CD is much less, and you do lose the fancy label. But the concept is the same.

Imagine for a moment that risen bread had never been invented. Then some shmoe tosses a handful of bacteria in with his flour and, Ureka! Now the shmoe wants to make money for the rest of his life off of the one-time accident. So he patents the idea. Now you, who's father and father's father shed their blood to put the patent system in place, can never eat Subway sandwiches, or even PB&J for that matter. Even though you and your family have a stake (in blood!) in the very mechanism which was supposed to protect him from the sharks of the business world for a very, very short time while he got himself set up with a business and a name and could hold his own. Your return investment on that blood your family shed was supposed to be that the patent is released into public domain and free for all to use after that very short time. So if you then wanted to set up a bread shop next door to the shmoe and run him out of business by beating him at bread baking, you could. You could use his patent to get started, because that right was paid for by your father and grandfather before you were old enough to count to ten.

Where did we go wrong? What caused this screwed up situation where no copyrighted material has become public domain since early in the last century, and corporations can own a patent in any way whatsoever? A patent should never belong to anything but an individual only, and not be transferable, except that it may then be leased, and then it should last for no more than a decade. If it wasn't innovative enough that everyone wants it right now, it wasn't innovative enough to put on record. Published works should become public domain after a decade. If you didn't make your money off the sales of your book by then, it wasn't that good of a book anyway, and you probably didn't deserve money for it. So, what jackass politician missed his saving throw? Who caved in to the call of that demon, Greed?

I know I touched many topics, and if this gets read by more than three people, a lot of nerves. But I have one more thing to say before I close, about the music industry. And I am going to start with a short story, poorly told;)

Once upon a time there was a country of people who allowed themselves to be called Swiss. They made watches. In fact, they made the best watches in the whole world. Everybody thought so. Because they made the best watches, they set the prices on their watches very high, and people paid it, and were happy, because they had a great watch that was very accurate. Then they invented a new kind of watch. It was made with a piece of crystal that vibrated very precisely when an electrical current was applied to it. But they were very happy, thank you, making watches the way they always had. After all, they were famous for their watches and everyone knew their watches were the best. So they sold the crystal watch idea to another group of people. A very industrious people called the Japanese. The Japanese people worked very hard and produced a watch much, much more acurate than the swiss watches, but the swiss just laughed and pointed, because those crystal-timed watches weren't Swiss, and they would never be what the Swiss watch was.

Now look at the quartz watch on your hand. The Swiss could still be the kings of the clock. Instead of Greenwich Mean Time, it could be Swiss Alps Time. The paradigm changed and they failed to adapt, and their time(no pun intended) as the clockmakers has passed.

The music industry has just passed such a crossroad, a year or two ago. They chose poorly. They failed to adapt. Their time, too, is passing. Musicians will make their name by publishing their music online and make their bills by doing live concerts, not making much money but loving what they are doing. Most of them are doing that now. At least, the ones worth listening to. Years from now, your children's children will look at you cross-eyed and say, "You mean you paid to listen to a recording? You mean it wasn't free on the internet!?!?" And hopefully, they will be listening to the latest song they downloaded from that new group on the lunar colony. And it will sound as awful to you as your music does to your grandparents.

Slashdot Top Deals

I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.