There is a way to us DNN/LLM "AI"s correctly; use them like a search engine.

Ask a hyper specific question, and scrutinize the answer given thoroughly.

In the same way that crowdsourced intelligence made google a useful tool for search, and social media created a great pool of questions and answers for that search to run over, DNN's are just an extension of search.

They are a wonderful improvement in the areas of (1) parsing the query and (2) re-jiggering the resultant hits.

(1) They can decode the user's question more accurately, and get a more searchable rewording of what the user is really looking for. Previous incarnations of search really needed you to find a magic word that matched perfectly to get the hits, and when you were using common words it became near impossible. But large language models seem able to do that with a much higher accuracy rate, and dont get hung up without magic keywords or magic phrases.

(2) Instead of merely presenting a raw list of sources, the LLM's actually read the pages, and try to parse out the specific bits you are searching for and ignore the rest of the page. They can also, to a limited extant, specialize the answer to match the query, based on interpolation of the page content. Again this is something that was previously impossible, and saves human time.

I would say, with judicious use of a search-engine DNN/LLM, any programmer should expect perhaps a 1% to 2% productivity increase on average.

Any programmer who tries to ask it to write code or solve problems will likely eat the worm, and suffer a 20%-50% decline in real productivity. Hopefully, any programmer caught doing this would face some kind of disciplinary action.

> It's not intelligence. It's processing.

Its like a souped up search engine;

Its very good at not only finding the answers to a query, but recognizing the question even if it is worded differently than it has been in the past, finding the existing answers, and presenting those answers even if it has to tweak or assemble or rearrange them.

What it cannot do is actually solve novel problems missing from its training set, any more than a search engine can find an match for a document that does not exist.

Exactly; if their plans were not profitable without endless supplies of tax money flowing into their pockets, they never really intended to build anything.

The established theory held. The gold exploded as expected.

The only interesting thing about this finding seems to be that they have a very fast thermometer, so fast it could get a reading of temperature within the trillionth of a second window as the gold was in the process of exploding.

Also, can anyone envision a "spaceflight" application of this? I wasnt aware speedy thermometers were a major barrier to space flight development.

if a hackathon amounts to gluing together a hosted 3rd party api with python... and only using its canned features in the most trivial way... it wasnt much of a "programming" contest in the first place.

It almost seems more like an advertisment for a hosted web service ... turns out thats exactly what it was...

> Every doctor youâ(TM)ve met could probably become a software engineer. Same for most lawyers.

I dont know how many doctors or lawyers this guy has met, but I'm guessing zero.

I have yet to find a single doctor or lawyer who could learn to code.

The sun is hurtling around the solar system at ~230 kps (relative to the local standard rest frame), but so is the asteroid.

Since both objects can be considered to be orbiting the milky way at the same speed, we generally consider that speed to be zero for the purposes of comparison, and only compare the two objects motion relative to each other.

Its actually very good news that CO2 is up. We should be hoping for ~1000ppm, which would make the earth absolutely lush and gardenlike.

> Google Deepmind has a definition for AGI,

Thats not a definition, its just a set of subjective heuristics for measuring. And its not even as useful as the basic turing test, which is a much more concise yardstick.

Definitions of AI all seem to come down to "we'll know it when we see it" which is the exact same thing as saying "we have no idea what it is"

lol, no, unicode is not broken. Human languages are just complex things, and there is no universal way to upper/lowercase things.

Changing the case of a string is language specific, and thus should not and cannot be well implemented at this filesystem level, because a file system should work for any language.

Linus is right.

> So Signal knows where you are, at what time, and your phone number.

exactly; its a mass invitation to get spied on while thinking you are secure.

Signal also has truly terrible user identification design, as the recent war planning leak shows. Instead of requiring in person exchange of certificates, and having any kind of external certificate validation system, its basically "blindly trust someone based on their phone number".

i dont think there is any safe way to operate signal, due to the lethal combination of closed source parts, centralized servers, and extremely bad user identification and authorization practices.

Tesla removed AM radios in 2018 and most EV makers don't bother trying to filter out the RF noise caused by the high power systems in the car which interfere with AM radio reception.

Are there *any* electric vehicles from which you can even hear AM radio stations?

look at the price of the dollar over the last 110 years. It went up exactly once and almost destroyed the country.

Thats what microstrategy is betting against: the US dollar.

Considering the limits of fed policy, its pretty much a guaranteed win.

Unless the government bans bitcoin or somehow prevents microstrategy from holding it, they cant really lose. The dollar cannot change its stripes.

> LN isn't all that it's cracked up to be. From a strictly technical PoV, a chain that can achieve high throughput on the main chain without sidechains or "payment channels" is going to win out.

Lol, this is such an insane comment.

You think every single micro-purchase of a coffee needs to be memorialized on a world-wide extremely replicated immutable ledger for all of time?

If you dont see why that is a bad idea, then you arent really qualified to have an opinion on the matter.

Obviously, only the most important and largest transactions truly belong there, and mostly everything else small and ephemeral belongs on a second or third layer above that.

Nothing is going to beat bitcoin, ever. Bitcoin is not a thing or even a specific technology even; its an economic concept with a continuously evolving and adapting set of supporting technologies.

We don't even yet know the health effects of breathing Silver Iodide! What do geoengineers think will happen to synthetic diamond dust in our lungs??