Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:An idea. (Score 1) 83

Here's an idea/question: Why can't Lastpass generate strong temporary passwords and send that to users?

It doesn't work that way. They would have to know your original master password in order to decrypt your database and re-encode it with the new temporary password. Since they do not know your master password, this idea fails.

Comment Something seems to be overlooked here. (Score 1) 849

I don't think an unsecured wifi is an open invitation to use someone's network. It would be similar to walking around with a lan cable plugging it in to someone's data ports trying to see if you get a connection. Also I see a lot of arguments that your computer is asking for a connection to open networks one after another until it finds one that grants it permission and hands out an IP. Wouldn't it also be your fault for connecting to their network because you set your computer to auto connect to any network it can find. Therefore you would also be at fault because you configured your computer to connect just as they configured their router to be unsecured.

Feed The Register: Speeding up the net - is it possible? (theregister.com)

It takes a little control

The best way to get reliable performance out of a wide area network (WAN) is to install your own high-speed gigabit fibre optic cables between all the locations in your organisation. This could provide seemingly unlimited bandwidth for your employees to use the applications they like and not have to think twice about the volume of content they send around the network.


Feed The Register: Harry Potter and the Chancers of eBay (theregister.com)

Deathly Hallows - Buy It Now!

Here's a Friday morning poser for you: a US book distributor accidently sends you a copy of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows pretty well a week before the official launch of what's expected to be the fastest-selling book of all time. What do you do?


PlayStation (Games)

Journal Journal: 'Bring it on' says Nintendo and Microsoft

Sony has recently announced a $ 100-00 PS3 price cut, but Xbox makers Microsoft and Nintendo, who makes the popular Wii, seems unperturbed. Microsoft says that Sony does not have the games to compete against the Xbox while Nintendo says that the PS3 is still not competitive on price.
Announcements

Submission + - Bill Gates to be demoted to 2nd richest man

Haxx writes: Not yet recognized by mainstream lists of the super rich, calculations of América Móvil stock prices point to a new world's richest man. The son of a Lebanese immigrant, Carlos Slim, 67, works from a windowless bunker in Mexico City. His empire includes a budget airline, Volaris, a cigarette company, Cigatam, a music retailer, MixUp, and an internet service provider, Prodigy. Slims main money makers are Telcel, the largest mobile operator in Mexico, commanding a market share in excess of 80 per cent and Telmex wich accounts for nine out of 10 landlines in Mexico.

Feed Engadget: Microsoft apologizes for not-so-Ultimate Extras (engadget.com)

Filed under: Desktops, Laptops

As anyone's that's sprung for the top-end Vista Ultimate can tell you, the much-ballyhooed "Ultimate Extras" have been anything but, having all but ceased after a brief Texas Hold 'Em-fueled flurry when they first went live. Now it seems that even Microsoft itself has owned up to their utter lameness, with Vista Ultimate director Barry Goffe taking the somewhat unusual step of issuing an apology on his blog. In addition to saying sorry for "taking so long to provide a status update to customers," Goffe says that Microsoft is on track to release the long-in-development DreamScene add-on by the end of the summer, along with an additional 20 language packs, and a couple of yet-to-be-announced mystery extras.

[Via Ars Technica]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Office Depot Featured Gadget: Xbox 360 Platinum System Packs the power to bring games to life!


Feed Techdirt: NFL Thinks It Gets To Decide How Long Is Fair Use For Video Clips (techdirt.com)

Sports leagues are amazing in their ability to try to over protect the content that should be delivering them additional fans. We've recently covered Major League Baseball's continued attempt to convince judges that it can own facts, while various soccer leagues have been suing YouTube for helping attract more fans to the sport. The National Football League is stepping out to its own levels of ridiculousness lately as well. In the past, we've covered the NFL's demand that news organizations only use official video footage of games (wondering if they'll ban cameraphones as well) and also its anger over churches showing the Super Bowl on a big screen without paying up. Then, of course, the NFL has been overly aggressive in bullying anyone who uses the name of the Super Bowl for anything, and recently tried to trademark "the Big Game" as well, after many advertisers started using that phrase to avoid running afoul of NFL lawyers over the Super Bowl. The NFL also abused the DMCA in demanding a law professor take down a clip on YouTube that was clearly fair use and which (amusingly) was being used to show how the NFL asserted certain rights it didn't actually have.

The latest is that the NFL has now expanded its rule for media companies. Not only must they only use officially provided NFL footage rather than their own cameras, they can only display 45-seconds of game time or players on their own websites -- and if they use any footage at all, it needs to contain a link back to the NFL site. While it's true that the NFL can set conditions for providing media outlets access to a game, they simply cannot dictate how a media organization reports the news. The restrictions say that media organizations can show as much of their own reporters standing in front of a camera as long as (yes, it gets this ridiculous) no NFL players are seen in the background. If the media interviews a player (or players) on its own, it can't include more than 45 total seconds of video coverage. The NFL admits that it's only doing this because it thinks it will get more money from having more people visit its own sites that will host more video clips. This is incredibly short-sighted, of course. The goal of the NFL should be to keep getting more fans, and then there are plenty of ways to make money off those fans without dictating how and where they can see video clips. In the meantime, it's about time that news organizations stood up to the NFL and said that they're going to report the news however they see fit, without restrictions from the league. They might also want to point out that the NFL doesn't get to decide what's "fair use" for their videos. News reporting is a fair use exception, so news organizations should be free to make use of whatever amount of the video they feel is appropriate for reporting on a story, without artificially made up limitations from the league. And, for video created by the organizations themselves, the media should be able to use as much of it as they want.
User Journal

Journal Journal: Nazi Documents Released to the public

According ot CBS News, 50 million pages detailing the lives of some 17 million victims of the holocaust have been released to the public. They detail everything from Gestopo warrants for arrest, to the movements of the victims from their homes to the death camps. It was chilling reading of how on Hitler's birthday, a prisoner was shot and killed every two minutes. Strange also was the intricate details they kept of the prisoner's health recording small things like lice.
Sadly, after a back

Slashdot Top Deals

There is no time like the present for postponing what you ought to be doing.

Working...